ORtg
87.8
59th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Evelina Sirsnina
LAT · b. 2009
//measurables
176 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileEfficient scoring profile
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer12.3 PPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
12.3 PPGScoring load · 92nd event percentile
46.1% TSScoring efficiency · 68th event percentile
- 46.1
- HESI v2.1
- #104
- of 192
- 74%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #104 of 192 · Established
HESI
46.1
Event performance
46th event percentile
PI
51.4
Prospect index
46th event percentile
ORtg
87.8
Points / 100 poss.
59th event percentile
DRtg
88.8
Lower is better
25th event percentile
NRtg
-1.0
Two-way margin
47th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 87.8 · 59th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 88.8 · Stop% 49.3% · Team DRtg 84.9
Sample context
7 games · 175 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
12.3 PPG92nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.1% TS68th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
46.1
46th event percentile
Prospect index
51.4
46th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
87.8
59th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.8
25th event percentile
Two-way margin
-1.0
47th event percentile
Stop percentage
49.3%
24th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
12.3 PPG
92nd event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
66th event percentile
Rebounding
2.3 RPG
35th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.6 stocks
66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.1% TS
68th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P92
Scorer
12.3 PPG · 92nd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 46th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 87.8 ORtg and 88.8 DRtg, producing a -1.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 92nd event percentile
Scoring load
12.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 68th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.1% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 66th event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Defensive stops
49.3% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 25th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.8 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 35th event percentile
Rebounding
2.3 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
12.3 PPG
92nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.1%
68th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
39.5%
56th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
34.6%
53rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
30.8%
context3.7 attempts per game
Free throws
78.6%
82nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.5%
55th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
66th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
88.8
25th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.8
34th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
49.3%
24th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.6 STL+BLK
66th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
34.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-1.0
47th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-0.7
46th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
46.1
46th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
51.4
46th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.0%
60th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.3 RPG
35th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
174.7
context25.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#104
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
560.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
12.3
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.7
APG
#104
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#104/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.3
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.7
APG
2.4
TOV/G
1.1
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.3
P92
Playmaking
1.7
P66
Rebounding
2.3
P35
True shooting
46%
P68
Two-way impact
-1.0
P47
Stops
49%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
28 made / 81 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
31%
8 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
79%
22 made / 28 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
●2PA 55●3PA 26
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
86
PTS
12.3 / game
28–81
FGM–FGA
8–26
3PM–3PA
22–28
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
1.7 / game
17
TOV
2.4 / game
0.71×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
16
REB
2.3 / game
6
OREB
10
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.3 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
21
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
46.1
HESI
51.4
PI
87.8
ORtg
88.8
DRtg
-1.0
NRtg
-0.7
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
4%
PIE
84.9
Team DRtg
-3.8
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#102
#103
ITA
10.3 PPG 3.0 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalShooter36% 3PT on 4.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#105
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
12.3
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.7
APG
1.3
SPG
0.3
BPG
31%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #104
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.3
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.7
APG
2.4
TOV/G
1.1
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.3
P92
Playmaking
1.7
P66
Rebounding
2.3
P35
True shooting
46%
P68
Two-way impact
-1.0
P47
Stops
49%
P24
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
28 made / 81 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
31%
8 made / 26 attempts
FT
Free throws
79%
22 made / 28 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
●2PA 55●3PA 26
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
86
PTS
12.3 / game
28–81
FGM–FGA
8–26
3PM–3PA
22–28
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
1.7 / game
17
TOV
2.4 / game
0.71×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
16
REB
2.3 / game
6
OREB
10
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.3 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
21
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
46.1
HESI
51.4
PI
87.8
ORtg
88.8
DRtg
-1.0
NRtg
-0.7
Stable NRtg
49%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
40%
eFG%
4%
PIE
84.9
Team DRtg
-3.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.