Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Emilia Magni

ITA · b. 2009

//measurables

174 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

10.3 PPGScoring load · 85th event percentile

48.3% TSScoring efficiency · 76th event percentile

47.6
HESI v2.1: #103
of 192: 74%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #103 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

47.6

Event performance

48th event percentile

52.6

Prospect index

47th event percentile

ORtg

91.7

Points / 100 poss.

65th event percentile

DRtg

92.4

Lower is better

18th event percentile

NRtg

-0.7

Two-way margin

48th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 91.7 · 65th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 92.4 · Stop% 44.5% · Team DRtg 86.3

Sample context

7 games · 173 minutes · 74% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

10.3 PPG85th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

48.3% TS76th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

47.6

48th event percentile

Prospect index

52.6

47th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

91.7

65th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

92.4

18th event percentile

Two-way margin

-0.7

48th event percentile

Stop percentage

44.5%

11th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

10.3 PPG

85th event percentile

Creation

1.7 APG

66th event percentile

Rebounding

3.0 RPG

55th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.6 stocks

30th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

48.3% TS

76th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

Shooter
36% 3PT on 4.0 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 48th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 91.7 ORtg and 92.4 DRtg, producing a -0.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Scoring load
10.3 PPG
85th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Scoring efficiency
48.3% TS
76th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Creation
1.7 APG
66th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
44.5% Stop%
11th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
92.4 DRtg
18th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive activity
0.6 steals + blocks/G
30th event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

91.7

65th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

10.3 PPG

85th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

48.3%

76th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

47.1%

80th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

39.7%

75th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

35.7%

context

4.0 attempts per game

Free throws

53.3%

44th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

40.7%

59th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.7 APG

66th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

92.4

18th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

86.3

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-6.2

20th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

44.5%

11th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.6 STL+BLK

30th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

28.9

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-0.7

48th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-0.5

48th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

47.6

48th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

52.6

47th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

4.5%

60th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.0 RPG

55th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

172.8

context

24.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

74.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#103

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

525.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

10.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

1.7

APG

#103

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#103/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

10.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

1.7

APG

1.9

TOV/G

1.4

3PM/G

48%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

10.3

P85

Playmaking

1.7

P66

Rebounding

3.0

P55

True shooting

48%

P76

Two-way impact

-0.7

P48

Stops

45%

P11

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

40%

27 made / 68 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

36%

10 made / 28 attempts

Free throws

53%

8 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

41% of attempts from three

●2PA 40●3PA 28

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

10.3 / game

27–68

FGM–FGA

10–28

3PM–3PA

8–15

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.7 / game

TOV

1.9 / game

0.92×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.0 / game

OREB

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.6 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

47.6

HESI

52.6

91.7

ORtg

92.4

DRtg

-0.7

NRtg

-0.5

Stable NRtg

45%

Stop%

41%

Floor%

47%

eFG%

PIE

86.3

Team DRtg

-6.2

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #102Yatong TangCHN

//current_rank

#103

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #104Evelina SirsninaLAT

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

10.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

1.7

APG

0.6

SPG

0.0

BPG

36%

3P%

48%

TS%

event_stats