Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Daisy Hocking portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Daisy Hocking

AUS · b. 2009

//measurables

177 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.0 APGCreation · 45th event percentile

0.8 stocksDefensive activity · 37th event percentile

45.5
HESI v2.1
#105
of 192
47%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #105 of 192 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

45.5

Event performance

46th event percentile

PI

50.9

Prospect index

46th event percentile

ORtg

74.7

Points / 100 poss.

39th event percentile

DRtg

77.2

Lower is better

73rd event percentile

NRtg

-2.5

Two-way margin

44th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 74.7 · 39th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 77.2 · Stop% 65.8% · Team DRtg 77.7

Sample context

5 games · 52 minutes · 47% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

1.0 APG45th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.8 stocks37th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

45.5

46th event percentile

Prospect index

50.9

46th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

74.7

39th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

77.2

73rd event percentile

Two-way margin

-2.5

44th event percentile

Stop percentage

65.8%

75th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.0 PPG

9th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Rebounding

2.2 RPG

34th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.8 stocks

37th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

23.0% TS

13th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 46th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 74.7 ORtg and 77.2 DRtg, producing a -2.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive stops

    65.8% Stop%

    75th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    77.2 DRtg

    73rd event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Scoring load

    1.0 PPG

    9th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    23.0% TS

    13th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

  3. Rebounding

    2.2 RPG

    34th event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

74.7

39th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.0 PPG

9th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

23.0%

13th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

20.0%

14th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

20.0%

15th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.6 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

35th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

36.3%

42nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

77.2

73rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

77.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.5

69th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

65.8%

75th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.8 STL+BLK

37th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

12.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-2.5

44th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-1.0

46th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

45.5

46th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

50.9

46th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.2%

35th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.2 RPG

34th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

52.3

context

10.5 minutes per game.

Sample weight

46.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#105

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

515.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

5

GP

1.0

PPG

2.2

RPG

1.0

APG

#105

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#105/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.0

PPG

2.2

RPG

1.0

APG

0.4

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

23%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.0

P9

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

2.2

P34

True shooting

23%

P13

Two-way impact

-2.5

P44

Stops

66%

P75

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

20%

2 made / 10 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

30% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

5

PTS

1.0 / game

2–10

FGM–FGA

0–3

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

5

AST

1.0 / game

2

TOV

0.4 / game

2.50×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

11

REB

2.2 / game

4

OREB

7

DREB

2.2

REB/G

defense

4

STL

0.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

4

PF

4

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

45.5

HESI

50.9

PI

74.7

ORtg

77.2

DRtg

-2.5

NRtg

-1.0

Stable NRtg

66%

Stop%

36%

Floor%

20%

eFG%

1%

PIE

77.7

Team DRtg

+0.5

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games52 minutes10.5 min/game47% sample weightrank #105 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #104Evelina SirsninaLAT

//current_rank

#105

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #106Hanyun SunCHN
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Emilia Magni portrait#103

    Emilia Magni

    ITA

    10.3 PPG 3.0 RPG 1.7 APG

    //event_signalShooter36% 3PT on 4.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Evelina Sirsnina portrait#104

    Evelina Sirsnina

    LAT

    12.3 PPG 2.3 RPG 1.7 APG

  • Hanyun Sun portrait#106

    Hanyun Sun

    CHN

    15.0 PPG 6.7 RPG 3.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5

GP

1.0

PPG

2.2

RPG

1.0

APG

0.8

SPG

0.0

BPG

0%

3P%

23%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

5 GP · event rank #105

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.0

PPG

2.2

RPG

1.0

APG

0.4

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

23%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.0

P9

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

2.2

P34

True shooting

23%

P13

Two-way impact

-2.5

P44

Stops

66%

P75

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

20%

2 made / 10 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 3 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

30% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 3

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

5

PTS

1.0 / game

2–10

FGM–FGA

0–3

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

5

AST

1.0 / game

2

TOV

0.4 / game

2.50×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

11

REB

2.2 / game

4

OREB

7

DREB

2.2

REB/G

defense

4

STL

0.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

4

PF

4

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

45.5

HESI

50.9

PI

74.7

ORtg

77.2

DRtg

-2.5

NRtg

-1.0

Stable NRtg

66%

Stop%

36%

Floor%

20%

eFG%

1%

PIE

77.7

Team DRtg

+0.5

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games52 minutes10.5 min/game47% sample weightrank #105 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.