ORtg
85.5
56th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
CHN · b. 2010
//measurables
189 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
15.0 PPGScoring load · 97th event percentile
3.0 APGCreation · 91st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #106 of 192 · High confidence
HESI
44.0
Event performance
44th event percentile
PI
50.9
Prospect index
45th event percentile
ORtg
85.5
Points / 100 poss.
56th event percentile
DRtg
87.1
Lower is better
35th event percentile
NRtg
-1.6
Two-way margin
46th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 85.5 · 56th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 87.1 · Stop% 56.6% · Team DRtg 85.4
Sample context
7 games · 219 minutes · 79% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Creation
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
44.0
44th event percentile
Prospect index
50.9
45th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
85.5
56th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
87.1
35th event percentile
Two-way margin
-1.6
46th event percentile
Stop percentage
56.6%
50th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
15.0 PPG
97th event percentile
Creation
3.0 APG
91st event percentile
Rebounding
6.7 RPG
91st event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
62nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
38.8% TS
43rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
15.0 PPG · 97th event percentile
Creator
3.0 APG · 91st event percentile
Rebounder
6.7 RPG · 91st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 44th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 85.5 ORtg and 87.1 DRtg, producing a -1.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, creation, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.
Scoring load
15.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Creation
3.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Rebounding
6.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive efficiency
87.1 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
85.5
56th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
15.0 PPG
97th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
38.8%
43rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.5%
44th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
32.8%
46th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.5%
context6.3 attempts per game
Free throws
53.3%
44th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
40.2%
57th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.0 APG
91st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
87.1
35th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
85.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.6
56th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
56.6%
50th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
62nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
47.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-1.6
46th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-1.2
44th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
44.0
44th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
50.9
45th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.8%
82nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.7 RPG
91st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
219.1
context31.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
78.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
High confidence
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#106
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
530.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
15.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
3.0
APG
#106
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
15.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
3.0
APG
2.4
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
15.0
P97
Playmaking
3.0
P91
Rebounding
6.7
P91
True shooting
39%
P43
Two-way impact
-1.6
P46
Stops
57%
P50
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
33%
40 made / 122 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
21%
9 made / 44 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
16 made / 30 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
105
PTS
15.0 / game
40–122
FGM–FGA
9–44
3PM–3PA
16–30
FTM–FTA
creation
21
AST
3.0 / game
17
TOV
2.4 / game
1.24×
AST:TOV
32
FD
rebounding
47
REB
6.7 / game
12
OREB
35
DREB
6.7
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.7 / game
4
BLK
0.6 / game
15
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
44.0
HESI
50.9
PI
85.5
ORtg
87.1
DRtg
-1.6
NRtg
-1.2
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
7%
PIE
85.4
Team DRtg
-1.6
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
//current_rank
#106
of 192 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
15.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
3.0
APG
0.7
SPG
0.6
BPG
21%
3P%
39%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #106
//quick_read
15.0
PPG
6.7
RPG
3.0
APG
2.4
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
39%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
15.0
P97
Playmaking
3.0
P91
Rebounding
6.7
P91
True shooting
39%
P43
Two-way impact
-1.6
P46
Stops
57%
P50
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
33%
40 made / 122 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
21%
9 made / 44 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
16 made / 30 attempts
Shot selection
36% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
105
PTS
15.0 / game
40–122
FGM–FGA
9–44
3PM–3PA
16–30
FTM–FTA
creation
21
AST
3.0 / game
17
TOV
2.4 / game
1.24×
AST:TOV
32
FD
rebounding
47
REB
6.7 / game
12
OREB
35
DREB
6.7
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.7 / game
4
BLK
0.6 / game
15
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
44.0
HESI
50.9
PI
85.5
ORtg
87.1
DRtg
-1.6
NRtg
-1.2
Stable NRtg
57%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
7%
PIE
85.4
Team DRtg
-1.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.