back_to_rankings
Salimata Kone portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Salimata Kone

CIV · b. 2010

//measurables

172 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.3 APGCreation · 83rd event percentile

2.0 stocksDefensive activity · 60th event percentile

77.3
HESI v2.1
#30
of 142
64%
sample weight

Performance

2 rated events

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #30 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

77.3

Event performance

77th event percentile

PI

75.7

Prospect index

79th event percentile

ORtg

65.3

Points / 100 poss.

59th event percentile

DRtg

47.4

Lower is better

88th event percentile

NRtg

+17.8

Two-way margin

74th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 65.3 · 59th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 47.4 · Stop% 64.4% · Team DRtg 41.7

Sample context

6 games · 105 minutes · 64% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.3 APG83rd event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks60th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

77.3

77th event percentile

Prospect index

75.7

79th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

65.3

59th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

47.4

88th event percentile

Two-way margin

+17.8

74th event percentile

Stop percentage

64.4%

43rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.0 PPG

40th event percentile

Creation

2.3 APG

83rd event percentile

Rebounding

1.3 RPG

21st event percentile

Defensive activity

2.0 stocks

60th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

33.4% TS

53rd event percentile

//rated_event_history

Every rated competition

Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 77th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 65.3 ORtg and 47.4 DRtg, producing a +17.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, creation, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are rebounding and scoring load.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive efficiency

    47.4 DRtg

    88th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  2. Creation

    2.3 APG

    83rd event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  3. Two-way margin

    +17.8 NRtg

    74th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Rebounding

    1.3 RPG

    21st event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

  2. Scoring load

    3.0 PPG

    40th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

65.3

59th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.0 PPG

40th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

33.4%

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

32.6%

56th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

30.4%

64th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

20.0%

context

0.8 attempts per game

Free throws

33.3%

24th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

32.1%

63rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.3 APG

83rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

47.4

88th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

41.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.8

21st event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

64.4%

43rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.0 STL+BLK

60th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+17.8

74th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+8.2

77th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

77.3

77th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

75.7

79th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

4.6%

56th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.3 RPG

21st event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

104.5

context

17.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

63.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#30

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

542.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

3.0

PPG

2.6

RPG

1.7

APG

#191

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#30

RANK

142

FIELD

79%

PERCENTILE

3.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#191/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.0

PPG

2.6

RPG

1.7

APG

4.1

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

22%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.0

P35

Playmaking

1.7

P66

Rebounding

2.6

P43

True shooting

22%

P11

Two-way impact

-67.1

P3

Stops

51%

P31

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

12%

5 made / 42 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

71%

10 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

14% of attempts from three

2PA 363PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

21

PTS

3.0 / game

5–42

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

10–14

FTM–FTA

creation

12

AST

1.7 / game

29

TOV

4.1 / game

0.41×

AST:TOV

13

FD

rebounding

18

REB

2.6 / game

4

OREB

14

DREB

2.6

REB/G

defense

13

STL

1.9 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

17

PF

13

STL+BLK

1.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

0.0

HESI

15.7

PI

35.2

ORtg

102.3

DRtg

-67.1

NRtg

-49.8

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

17%

Floor%

13%

eFG%

-4%

PIE

101.1

Team DRtg

-1.2

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games173 minutes24.8 min/game74% sample weightrank #191 of 192

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#30/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.0

PPG

1.3

RPG

2.3

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

33%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.0

P40

Playmaking

2.3

P83

Rebounding

1.3

P21

True shooting

33%

P53

Two-way impact

+17.8

P74

Stops

64%

P43

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

7 made / 23 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

1 made / 5 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

3 made / 9 attempts

Shot selection

22% of attempts from three

2PA 183PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

18

PTS

3.0 / game

7–23

FGM–FGA

1–5

3PM–3PA

3–9

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

12

TOV

2.0 / game

1.17×

AST:TOV

11

FD

rebounding

8

REB

1.3 / game

2

OREB

6

DREB

1.3

REB/G

defense

11

STL

1.8 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

11

PF

12

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

77.3

HESI

75.7

PI

65.3

ORtg

47.4

DRtg

+17.8

NRtg

+8.2

Stable NRtg

64%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

33%

eFG%

5%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

-5.8

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games105 minutes17.4 min/game64% sample weightrank #30 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Amelia Alonso portrait#2

    Amelia Alonso

    Spain

    12.4 PPG 7.0 RPG 1.9 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Aichata Mambone portrait#189

    Aichata Mambone

    Côte d'Ivoire

    0.1 PPG 0.9 RPG 0.1 APG

  • Meredith Jaime portrait#190

    Meredith Jaime

    MEX

    0.8 PPG 1.2 RPG 0.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

3.0

PPG

1.3

RPG

2.3

APG

1.8

SPG

0.2

BPG

20%

3P%

33%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #191

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.0

PPG

2.6

RPG

1.7

APG

4.1

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

22%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.0

P35

Playmaking

1.7

P66

Rebounding

2.6

P43

True shooting

22%

P11

Two-way impact

-67.1

P3

Stops

51%

P31

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

12%

5 made / 42 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

71%

10 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

14% of attempts from three

2PA 363PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

21

PTS

3.0 / game

5–42

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

10–14

FTM–FTA

creation

12

AST

1.7 / game

29

TOV

4.1 / game

0.41×

AST:TOV

13

FD

rebounding

18

REB

2.6 / game

4

OREB

14

DREB

2.6

REB/G

defense

13

STL

1.9 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

17

PF

13

STL+BLK

1.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

0.0

HESI

15.7

PI

35.2

ORtg

102.3

DRtg

-67.1

NRtg

-49.8

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

17%

Floor%

13%

eFG%

-4%

PIE

101.1

Team DRtg

-1.2

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games173 minutes24.8 min/game74% sample weightrank #191 of 192

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #30

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.0

PPG

1.3

RPG

2.3

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

33%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.0

P40

Playmaking

2.3

P83

Rebounding

1.3

P21

True shooting

33%

P53

Two-way impact

+17.8

P74

Stops

64%

P43

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

7 made / 23 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

20%

1 made / 5 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

3 made / 9 attempts

Shot selection

22% of attempts from three

2PA 183PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

18

PTS

3.0 / game

7–23

FGM–FGA

1–5

3PM–3PA

3–9

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

12

TOV

2.0 / game

1.17×

AST:TOV

11

FD

rebounding

8

REB

1.3 / game

2

OREB

6

DREB

1.3

REB/G

defense

11

STL

1.8 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

11

PF

12

STL+BLK

2.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

77.3

HESI

75.7

PI

65.3

ORtg

47.4

DRtg

+17.8

NRtg

+8.2

Stable NRtg

64%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

33%

eFG%

5%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

-5.8

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games105 minutes17.4 min/game64% sample weightrank #30 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.