ORtg
111.6
92nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
USA · b. 2009
//measurables
170 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
5.0 APGCreation · 99th event percentile
55.8% TSScoring efficiency · 91st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #16 of 192 · Established
HESI
92.7
Event performance
92nd event percentile
PI
88.6
Prospect index
92nd event percentile
ORtg
111.6
Points / 100 poss.
92nd event percentile
DRtg
69.3
Lower is better
88th event percentile
NRtg
+42.3
Two-way margin
91st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 111.6 · 92nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 69.3 · Stop% 61.9% · Team DRtg 66.5
Sample context
7 games · 140 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
92.7
92nd event percentile
Prospect index
88.6
92nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
111.6
92nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
69.3
88th event percentile
Two-way margin
+42.3
91st event percentile
Stop percentage
61.9%
65th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
8.1 PPG
78th event percentile
Creation
5.0 APG
99th event percentile
Rebounding
1.9 RPG
23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
2.0 stocks
53rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.8% TS
91st event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Creator
5.0 APG · 99th event percentile
Offensive Impact
111.6 ORtg · 92nd event percentile
Event Impact
92.7 HESI performance · 92nd event percentile
Event Efficiency
56% TS on 8.1 PPG · 91st event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+42.3 Net Rating · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 92nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 111.6 ORtg and 69.3 DRtg, producing a +42.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Creation
5.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Offensive efficiency
111.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Two-way margin
+42.3 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Rebounding
1.9 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
111.6
92nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
8.1 PPG
78th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
55.8%
91st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
46.3%
87th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
30.0%
context1.4 attempts per game
Free throws
69.6%
68th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
53.3%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
5.0 APG
99th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
69.3
88th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
66.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.8
43rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
61.9%
65th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.0 STL+BLK
53rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
35.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+42.3
91st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+29.7
92nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
92.7
92nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.6
92nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
8.1%
89th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.9 RPG
23rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
140.4
context20.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#16
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
564.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
8.1
PPG
1.9
RPG
5.0
APG
#16
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
8.1
PPG
1.9
RPG
5.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.1
P78
Playmaking
5.0
P99
Rebounding
1.9
P23
True shooting
56%
P91
Two-way impact
+42.3
P91
Stops
62%
P65
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
19 made / 41 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
70%
16 made / 23 attempts
Shot selection
24% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
57
PTS
8.1 / game
19–41
FGM–FGA
3–10
3PM–3PA
16–23
FTM–FTA
creation
35
AST
5.0 / game
16
TOV
2.3 / game
2.19×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
13
REB
1.9 / game
3
OREB
10
DREB
1.9
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
14
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
92.7
HESI
88.6
PI
111.6
ORtg
69.3
DRtg
+42.3
NRtg
+29.7
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
8%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-2.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
//current_rank
#16
of 192 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
8.1
PPG
1.9
RPG
5.0
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
30%
3P%
56%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #16
//quick_read
8.1
PPG
1.9
RPG
5.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.1
P78
Playmaking
5.0
P99
Rebounding
1.9
P23
True shooting
56%
P91
Two-way impact
+42.3
P91
Stops
62%
P65
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
46%
19 made / 41 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
3 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
70%
16 made / 23 attempts
Shot selection
24% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
57
PTS
8.1 / game
19–41
FGM–FGA
3–10
3PM–3PA
16–23
FTM–FTA
creation
35
AST
5.0 / game
16
TOV
2.3 / game
2.19×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
13
REB
1.9 / game
3
OREB
10
DREB
1.9
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
14
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
92.7
HESI
88.6
PI
111.6
ORtg
69.3
DRtg
+42.3
NRtg
+29.7
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
8%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-2.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.