ORtg
110.4
91st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Emilia Ainley
NZL · b. 2010
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRebounder10.3 RPG · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.3 BPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency58% TS on 11.9 PPG · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact110.4 ORtg · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
10.3 RPGRebounding · 99th event percentile
58.3% TSScoring efficiency · 94th event percentile
- 91.6
- HESI v2.1
- #15
- of 192
- 75%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #15 of 192 · Established
HESI
91.6
Event performance
91st event percentile
PI
89.0
Prospect index
92nd event percentile
ORtg
110.4
Points / 100 poss.
91st event percentile
DRtg
76.5
Lower is better
74th event percentile
NRtg
+33.9
Two-way margin
90th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 110.4 · 91st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 76.5 · Stop% 72.9% · Team DRtg 80.5
Sample context
7 games · 180 minutes · 75% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
10.3 RPG99th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.3% TS94th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
91.6
91st event percentile
Prospect index
89.0
92nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
110.4
91st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
76.5
74th event percentile
Two-way margin
+33.9
90th event percentile
Stop percentage
72.9%
88th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
11.9 PPG
90th event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
53rd event percentile
Rebounding
10.3 RPG
99th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.7 stocks
63rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.3% TS
94th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P99
Rebounder
10.3 RPG · 99th event percentile
- P95
Rim Protection
1.3 BPG · 95th event percentile
- P94
Event Efficiency
58% TS on 11.9 PPG · 94th event percentile
- P91
Offensive Impact
110.4 ORtg · 91st event percentile
- P91
Event Impact
91.6 HESI performance · 91st event percentile
- P90
Scorer
11.9 PPG · 90th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 91st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 110.4 ORtg and 76.5 DRtg, producing a +33.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Rebounding
10.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 94th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.3% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 91st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
110.4 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
11.9 PPG
90th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
58.3%
94th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
56.9%
97th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
56.9%
98th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.7 attempts per game
Free throws
56.7%
47th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
56.1%
96th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
53rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
76.5
74th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.0
87th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
72.9%
88th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.7 STL+BLK
63rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
51.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+33.9
90th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+25.5
91st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
91.6
91st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
89.0
92nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
14.3%
99th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
10.3 RPG
99th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
179.9
context25.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
75.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#15
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
550.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
11.9
PPG
10.3
RPG
1.3
APG
#15
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#15/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.9
PPG
10.3
RPG
1.3
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.9
P90
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
10.3
P99
True shooting
58%
P94
Two-way impact
+33.9
P90
Stops
73%
P88
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
57%
33 made / 58 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
17 made / 30 attempts
Shot selection
9% of attempts from three
●2PA 53●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
83
PTS
11.9 / game
33–58
FGM–FGA
0–5
3PM–3PA
17–30
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.3 / game
12
TOV
1.7 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
72
REB
10.3 / game
23
OREB
49
DREB
10.3
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.4 / game
9
BLK
1.3 / game
9
PF
12
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
91.6
HESI
89.0
PI
110.4
ORtg
76.5
DRtg
+33.9
NRtg
+25.5
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
14%
PIE
80.5
Team DRtg
+4.0
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #14Miya TakeuchiJPNrank_below · #16Morghan ReckleyUnited States
//current_rank
#15
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#13
#14
JPN
18.1 PPG 2.4 RPG 4.9 APG
//event_signalScorer18.1 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#16
United States
8.1 PPG 1.9 RPG 5.0 APG
//event_signalCreator5.0 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
11.9
PPG
10.3
RPG
1.3
APG
0.4
SPG
1.3
BPG
0%
3P%
58%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #15
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.9
PPG
10.3
RPG
1.3
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.9
P90
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
10.3
P99
True shooting
58%
P94
Two-way impact
+33.9
P90
Stops
73%
P88
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
57%
33 made / 58 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
57%
17 made / 30 attempts
Shot selection
9% of attempts from three
●2PA 53●3PA 5
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
83
PTS
11.9 / game
33–58
FGM–FGA
0–5
3PM–3PA
17–30
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.3 / game
12
TOV
1.7 / game
0.75×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
72
REB
10.3 / game
23
OREB
49
DREB
10.3
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.4 / game
9
BLK
1.3 / game
9
PF
12
STL+BLK
1.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
91.6
HESI
89.0
PI
110.4
ORtg
76.5
DRtg
+33.9
NRtg
+25.5
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
56%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
14%
PIE
80.5
Team DRtg
+4.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.