ORtg
118.9
95th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Caroline Bradley
USA · b. 2009
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact118.9 ORtg · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact92.2 HESI performance · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder6.8 RPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+50.6 Net Rating · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
6.8 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile
51.2% TSScoring efficiency · 83rd event percentile
- 92.2
- HESI v2.1
- #17
- of 192
- 56%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #17 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
92.2
Event performance
92nd event percentile
PI
88.2
Prospect index
91st event percentile
ORtg
118.9
Points / 100 poss.
95th event percentile
DRtg
68.2
Lower is better
90th event percentile
NRtg
+50.6
Two-way margin
96th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 118.9 · 95th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 68.2 · Stop% 64.5% · Team DRtg 66.5
Sample context
5 games · 77 minutes · 56% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
6.8 RPG92nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.2% TS83rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
92.2
92nd event percentile
Prospect index
88.2
91st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
118.9
95th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.2
90th event percentile
Two-way margin
+50.6
96th event percentile
Stop percentage
64.5%
72nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.2 PPG
70th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
16th event percentile
Rebounding
6.8 RPG
92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
50th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.2% TS
83rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Offensive Impact
118.9 ORtg · 95th event percentile
- P94
Event Impact
92.2 HESI performance · 94th event percentile
- P92
Rebounder
6.8 RPG · 92nd event percentile
- P91
Two-Way Impact
+50.6 Net Rating · 91st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 92nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 118.9 ORtg and 68.2 DRtg, producing a +50.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and rebounding. The lowest relative area is creation.
Relative strengths
- 96th event percentile
Two-way margin
+50.6 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 95th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
118.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 92nd event percentile
Rebounding
6.8 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 16th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.2 PPG
70th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
51.2%
83rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
43.1%
66th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
41.4%
80th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
100.0%
context0.2 attempts per game
Free throws
78.6%
82nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
57.2%
97th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.4 APG
16th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
68.2
90th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
66.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.7
55th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
64.5%
72nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
50th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
20.1
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+50.6
96th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+28.6
92nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
92.2
92nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.2
91st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.1%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.8 RPG
92nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
77.2
context15.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
56.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#17
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
564.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
5
GP
7.2
PPG
6.8
RPG
0.4
APG
#17
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#17/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.2
PPG
6.8
RPG
0.4
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.2
P70
Playmaking
0.4
P16
Rebounding
6.8
P92
True shooting
51%
P83
Two-way impact
+50.6
P96
Stops
64%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
41%
12 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
100%
1 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
79%
11 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
3% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
36
PTS
7.2 / game
12–29
FGM–FGA
1–1
3PM–3PA
11–14
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.4 / game
5
TOV
1.0 / game
0.40×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
34
REB
6.8 / game
16
OREB
18
DREB
6.8
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
4
BLK
0.8 / game
5
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
92.2
HESI
88.2
PI
118.9
ORtg
68.2
DRtg
+50.6
NRtg
+28.6
Stable NRtg
64%
Stop%
57%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
5%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-1.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #16Morghan ReckleyUnited Statesrank_below · #18Anais GobecSLO
//current_rank
#17
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#15
NZL
11.9 PPG 10.3 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.3 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#16
United States
8.1 PPG 1.9 RPG 5.0 APG
//event_signalCreator5.0 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#18
SLO
14.7 PPG 6.3 RPG 3.3 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
7.2
PPG
6.8
RPG
0.4
APG
0.2
SPG
0.8
BPG
100%
3P%
51%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
5 GP · event rank #17
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.2
PPG
6.8
RPG
0.4
APG
1.0
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.2
P70
Playmaking
0.4
P16
Rebounding
6.8
P92
True shooting
51%
P83
Two-way impact
+50.6
P96
Stops
64%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
41%
12 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
100%
1 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
79%
11 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
3% of attempts from three
●2PA 28●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
36
PTS
7.2 / game
12–29
FGM–FGA
1–1
3PM–3PA
11–14
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.4 / game
5
TOV
1.0 / game
0.40×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
34
REB
6.8 / game
16
OREB
18
DREB
6.8
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
4
BLK
0.8 / game
5
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
92.2
HESI
88.2
PI
118.9
ORtg
68.2
DRtg
+50.6
NRtg
+28.6
Stable NRtg
64%
Stop%
57%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
5%
PIE
66.5
Team DRtg
-1.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.