ORtg
108.2
89th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
SLO · b. 2011
//measurables
178 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
14.7 PPGScoring load · 97th event percentile
3.3 APGCreation · 94th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #18 of 192 · High confidence
HESI
89.0
Event performance
89th event percentile
PI
88.1
Prospect index
91st event percentile
ORtg
108.2
Points / 100 poss.
89th event percentile
DRtg
83.3
Lower is better
51st event percentile
NRtg
+24.9
Two-way margin
83rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 108.2 · 89th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 83.3 · Stop% 70.6% · Team DRtg 88.0
Sample context
7 games · 202 minutes · 77% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Creation
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
89.0
89th event percentile
Prospect index
88.1
91st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
108.2
89th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
83.3
51st event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.9
83rd event percentile
Stop percentage
70.6%
84th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
14.7 PPG
97th event percentile
Creation
3.3 APG
94th event percentile
Rebounding
6.3 RPG
89th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.0 stocks
87th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
57.2% TS
92nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
14.7 PPG · 97th event percentile
Creator
3.3 APG · 94th event percentile
Event Efficiency
57% TS on 14.7 PPG · 92nd event percentile
Offensive Impact
108.2 ORtg · 89th event percentile
Rebounder
6.3 RPG · 89th event percentile
Activity
6.3 RPG + 3.0 defensive plays/G · 88th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 89th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 108.2 ORtg and 83.3 DRtg, producing a +24.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, creation, and scoring efficiency.
Scoring load
14.7 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Creation
3.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring efficiency
57.2% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
108.2
89th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
14.7 PPG
97th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
57.2%
92nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
48.7%
84th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
46.7%
88th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context2.1 attempts per game
Free throws
88.2%
90th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
50.5%
88th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
3.3 APG
94th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
83.3
51st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.8
89th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.6%
84th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.0 STL+BLK
87th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
52.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+24.9
83rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+19.3
89th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
89.0
89th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
88.1
91st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
18.0%
99th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.3 RPG
89th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
202.2
context28.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
77.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
High confidence
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#18
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
512.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
14.7
PPG
6.3
RPG
3.3
APG
#18
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
14.7
PPG
6.3
RPG
3.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
14.7
P97
Playmaking
3.3
P94
Rebounding
6.3
P89
True shooting
57%
P92
Two-way impact
+24.9
P83
Stops
71%
P84
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
47%
35 made / 75 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
3 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
88%
30 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
103
PTS
14.7 / game
35–75
FGM–FGA
3–15
3PM–3PA
30–34
FTM–FTA
creation
23
AST
3.3 / game
21
TOV
3.0 / game
1.10×
AST:TOV
28
FD
rebounding
44
REB
6.3 / game
10
OREB
34
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
16
STL
2.3 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
12
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
89.0
HESI
88.1
PI
108.2
ORtg
83.3
DRtg
+24.9
NRtg
+19.3
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
51%
Floor%
49%
eFG%
18%
PIE
88.0
Team DRtg
+4.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
//current_rank
#18
of 192 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
14.7
PPG
6.3
RPG
3.3
APG
2.3
SPG
0.7
BPG
20%
3P%
57%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #18
//quick_read
14.7
PPG
6.3
RPG
3.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
14.7
P97
Playmaking
3.3
P94
Rebounding
6.3
P89
True shooting
57%
P92
Two-way impact
+24.9
P83
Stops
71%
P84
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
47%
35 made / 75 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
3 made / 15 attempts
FT
Free throws
88%
30 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
20% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
103
PTS
14.7 / game
35–75
FGM–FGA
3–15
3PM–3PA
30–34
FTM–FTA
creation
23
AST
3.3 / game
21
TOV
3.0 / game
1.10×
AST:TOV
28
FD
rebounding
44
REB
6.3 / game
10
OREB
34
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
16
STL
2.3 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
12
PF
21
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
89.0
HESI
88.1
PI
108.2
ORtg
83.3
DRtg
+24.9
NRtg
+19.3
Stable NRtg
71%
Stop%
51%
Floor%
49%
eFG%
18%
PIE
88.0
Team DRtg
+4.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.