ORtg
107.1
88th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
AUS · b. 2009
//measurables
177 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
55.9% TSScoring efficiency · 91st event percentile
12.1 PPGScoring load · 91st event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #19 of 192 · Established
HESI
91.1
Event performance
91st event percentile
PI
87.4
Prospect index
90th event percentile
ORtg
107.1
Points / 100 poss.
88th event percentile
DRtg
73.8
Lower is better
80th event percentile
NRtg
+33.2
Two-way margin
89th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 107.1 · 88th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 73.8 · Stop% 73.4% · Team DRtg 77.7
Sample context
7 games · 193 minutes · 76% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Scoring load
Questions for film
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
91.1
91st event percentile
Prospect index
87.4
90th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
107.1
88th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.8
80th event percentile
Two-way margin
+33.2
89th event percentile
Stop percentage
73.4%
89th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
12.1 PPG
91st event percentile
Creation
2.1 APG
75th event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
76th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks
58th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
55.9% TS
91st event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Efficiency
56% TS on 12.1 PPG · 91st event percentile
Scorer
12.1 PPG · 91st event percentile
Event Impact
91.1 HESI performance · 90th event percentile
Offensive Impact
107.1 ORtg · 88th event percentile
Two-Way Impact
+33.2 Net Rating · 87th event percentile
Shooter
40% 3PT on 4.3 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 91st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 107.1 ORtg and 73.8 DRtg, producing a +33.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, scoring load, and two-way margin.
Scoring efficiency
55.9% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Scoring load
12.1 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Two-way margin
+33.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
107.1
88th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
12.1 PPG
91st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
55.9%
91st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
52.3%
92nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
43.1%
83rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
40.0%
context4.3 attempts per game
Free throws
68.0%
66th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
47.3%
82nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.1 APG
75th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
73.8
80th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.8
86th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
73.4%
89th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.3 STL+BLK
58th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
52.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+33.2
89th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+25.4
91st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
91.1
91st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
87.4
90th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
12.2%
96th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.7 RPG
76th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
193.1
context27.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
76.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#19
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
515.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
12.1
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.1
APG
#19
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
12.1
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.1
APG
2.0
TOV/G
1.7
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.1
P91
Playmaking
2.1
P75
Rebounding
4.7
P76
True shooting
56%
P91
Two-way impact
+33.2
P89
Stops
73%
P89
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
43%
28 made / 65 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
12 made / 30 attempts
FT
Free throws
68%
17 made / 25 attempts
Shot selection
46% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
85
PTS
12.1 / game
28–65
FGM–FGA
12–30
3PM–3PA
17–25
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.1 / game
14
TOV
2.0 / game
1.07×
AST:TOV
26
FD
rebounding
33
REB
4.7 / game
12
OREB
21
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
23
STL
3.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
9
PF
23
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
91.1
HESI
87.4
PI
107.1
ORtg
73.8
DRtg
+33.2
NRtg
+25.4
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
52%
eFG%
12%
PIE
77.7
Team DRtg
+3.8
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
12.1
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.1
APG
3.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
40%
3P%
56%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #19
//quick_read
12.1
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.1
APG
2.0
TOV/G
1.7
3PM/G
56%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
12.1
P91
Playmaking
2.1
P75
Rebounding
4.7
P76
True shooting
56%
P91
Two-way impact
+33.2
P89
Stops
73%
P89
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
43%
28 made / 65 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
40%
12 made / 30 attempts
FT
Free throws
68%
17 made / 25 attempts
Shot selection
46% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
85
PTS
12.1 / game
28–65
FGM–FGA
12–30
3PM–3PA
17–25
FTM–FTA
creation
15
AST
2.1 / game
14
TOV
2.0 / game
1.07×
AST:TOV
26
FD
rebounding
33
REB
4.7 / game
12
OREB
21
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
23
STL
3.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
9
PF
23
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
91.1
HESI
87.4
PI
107.1
ORtg
73.8
DRtg
+33.2
NRtg
+25.4
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
52%
eFG%
12%
PIE
77.7
Team DRtg
+3.8
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.