back_to_rankings
Olivia Olechnowicz portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Olivia Olechnowicz

AUS · b. 2009

//measurables

177 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Two-way event impact

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalEvent Efficiency56% TS on 12.1 PPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer12.1 PPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact91.1 HESI performance · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact107.1 ORtg · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

55.9% TSScoring efficiency · 91st event percentile

12.1 PPGScoring load · 91st event percentile

91.1
HESI v2.1
#19
of 192
76%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #19 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

91.1

Event performance

91st event percentile

PI

87.4

Prospect index

90th event percentile

ORtg

107.1

Points / 100 poss.

88th event percentile

DRtg

73.8

Lower is better

80th event percentile

NRtg

+33.2

Two-way margin

89th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 107.1 · 88th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 73.8 · Stop% 73.4% · Team DRtg 77.7

Sample context

7 games · 193 minutes · 76% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Two-way event impactevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

55.9% TS91st event percentile

Scoring load

12.1 PPG91st event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

91.1

91st event percentile

Prospect index

87.4

90th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

107.1

88th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

73.8

80th event percentile

Two-way margin

+33.2

89th event percentile

Stop percentage

73.4%

89th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.1 PPG

91st event percentile

Creation

2.1 APG

75th event percentile

Rebounding

4.7 RPG

76th event percentile

Defensive activity

3.3 stocks

58th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

55.9% TS

91st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P91

    Event Efficiency

    56% TS on 12.1 PPG · 91st event percentile

  • P91

    Scorer

    12.1 PPG · 91st event percentile

  • P90

    Event Impact

    91.1 HESI performance · 90th event percentile

  • P88

    Offensive Impact

    107.1 ORtg · 88th event percentile

  • P87

    Two-Way Impact

    +33.2 Net Rating · 87th event percentile

  • Shooter

    40% 3PT on 4.3 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 91st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 107.1 ORtg and 73.8 DRtg, producing a +33.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, scoring load, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring efficiency

    55.9% TS

    91st event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

  2. Scoring load

    12.1 PPG

    91st event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Two-way margin

    +33.2 NRtg

    89th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

107.1

88th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.1 PPG

91st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

55.9%

91st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

52.3%

92nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

43.1%

83rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

40.0%

context

4.3 attempts per game

Free throws

68.0%

66th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

47.3%

82nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.1 APG

75th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

73.8

80th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

77.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+3.8

86th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

73.4%

89th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.3 STL+BLK

58th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

52.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+33.2

89th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+25.4

91st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

91.1

91st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

87.4

90th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

12.2%

96th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.7 RPG

76th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

193.1

context

27.6 minutes per game.

Sample weight

76.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#19

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

515.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

12.1

PPG

4.7

RPG

2.1

APG

#19

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#19/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.1

PPG

4.7

RPG

2.1

APG

2.0

TOV/G

1.7

3PM/G

56%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.1

P91

Playmaking

2.1

P75

Rebounding

4.7

P76

True shooting

56%

P91

Two-way impact

+33.2

P89

Stops

73%

P89

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

43%

28 made / 65 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

40%

12 made / 30 attempts

FT

Free throws

68%

17 made / 25 attempts

Shot selection

46% of attempts from three

2PA 353PA 30

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

85

PTS

12.1 / game

28–65

FGM–FGA

12–30

3PM–3PA

17–25

FTM–FTA

creation

15

AST

2.1 / game

14

TOV

2.0 / game

1.07×

AST:TOV

26

FD

rebounding

33

REB

4.7 / game

12

OREB

21

DREB

4.7

REB/G

defense

23

STL

3.3 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

9

PF

23

STL+BLK

3.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

91.1

HESI

87.4

PI

107.1

ORtg

73.8

DRtg

+33.2

NRtg

+25.4

Stable NRtg

73%

Stop%

47%

Floor%

52%

eFG%

12%

PIE

77.7

Team DRtg

+3.8

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games193 minutes27.6 min/game76% sample weightrank #19 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Caroline Bradley portrait#17

    Caroline Bradley

    United States

    7.2 PPG 6.8 RPG 0.4 APG

  • Anais Gobec portrait#18

    Anais Gobec

    SLO

    14.7 PPG 6.3 RPG 3.3 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Emerald Nnani portrait#20

    Emerald Nnani

    Canada

    8.3 PPG 7.3 RPG 1.4 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

12.1

PPG

4.7

RPG

2.1

APG

3.3

SPG

0.0

BPG

40%

3P%

56%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #19

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.1

PPG

4.7

RPG

2.1

APG

2.0

TOV/G

1.7

3PM/G

56%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.1

P91

Playmaking

2.1

P75

Rebounding

4.7

P76

True shooting

56%

P91

Two-way impact

+33.2

P89

Stops

73%

P89

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

43%

28 made / 65 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

40%

12 made / 30 attempts

FT

Free throws

68%

17 made / 25 attempts

Shot selection

46% of attempts from three

2PA 353PA 30

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

85

PTS

12.1 / game

28–65

FGM–FGA

12–30

3PM–3PA

17–25

FTM–FTA

creation

15

AST

2.1 / game

14

TOV

2.0 / game

1.07×

AST:TOV

26

FD

rebounding

33

REB

4.7 / game

12

OREB

21

DREB

4.7

REB/G

defense

23

STL

3.3 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

9

PF

23

STL+BLK

3.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

91.1

HESI

87.4

PI

107.1

ORtg

73.8

DRtg

+33.2

NRtg

+25.4

Stable NRtg

73%

Stop%

47%

Floor%

52%

eFG%

12%

PIE

77.7

Team DRtg

+3.8

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games193 minutes27.6 min/game76% sample weightrank #19 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.