ORtg
8.7
5th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Namiga Alexandra Kassa
BEN · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
3.8 RPGRebounding · 55th event percentile
0.3 stocksDefensive activity · 17th event percentile
- 2.8
- HESI v2.1
- #139
- of 142
- 39%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #139 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
2.8
Event performance
3rd event percentile
PI
13.8
Prospect index
2nd event percentile
ORtg
8.7
Points / 100 poss.
5th event percentile
DRtg
81.3
Lower is better
8th event percentile
NRtg
-72.6
Two-way margin
3rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 8.7 · 5th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 81.3 · Stop% 58.5% · Team DRtg 80.2
Sample context
4 games · 38 minutes · 39% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
3.8 RPG55th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 stocks17th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
2.8
3rd event percentile
Prospect index
13.8
2nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
8.7
5th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.3
8th event percentile
Two-way margin
-72.6
3rd event percentile
Stop percentage
58.5%
27th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
0.5 PPG
8th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
55th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 stocks
17th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
5.9% TS
5th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 3rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 8.7 ORtg and 81.3 DRtg, producing a -72.6 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 3rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-72.6 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 5th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
5.9% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 5th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
8.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
0.5 PPG
8th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
5.9%
5th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
6.3%
7th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
6.3%
8th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
0.0%
5th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
4.4%
6th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
81.3
8th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.1
52nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
58.5%
27th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.3 STL+BLK
17th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
11.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-72.6
3rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-33.5
3rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
2.8
3rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
13.8
2nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-12.7%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
55th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
38.3
context9.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
39.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#139
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
406.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
0.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.0
APG
#139
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#139/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.0
APG
4.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
6%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.5
P8
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
3.8
P55
True shooting
6%
P5
Two-way impact
-72.6
P3
Stops
59%
P27
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
6%
1 made / 16 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
2
PTS
0.5 / game
1–16
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
18
TOV
4.5 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.8 / game
7
OREB
8
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
2.8
HESI
13.8
PI
8.7
ORtg
81.3
DRtg
-72.6
NRtg
-33.5
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
4%
Floor%
6%
eFG%
-13%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
-1.1
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #138Melvina KOKERANGCentral African Republicrank_below · #140Mariam CAMARACentral African Republic
//current_rank
#139
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#137
#138
Central African Republic
2.4 PPG 12.6 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalRebounder12.6 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity12.6 RPG + 2.2 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#140
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
0.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
6%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #139
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.5
PPG
3.8
RPG
0.0
APG
4.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
6%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.5
P8
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
3.8
P55
True shooting
6%
P5
Two-way impact
-72.6
P3
Stops
59%
P27
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
6%
1 made / 16 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 16●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
2
PTS
0.5 / game
1–16
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
18
TOV
4.5 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
1
FD
rebounding
15
REB
3.8 / game
7
OREB
8
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
5
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
2.8
HESI
13.8
PI
8.7
ORtg
81.3
DRtg
-72.6
NRtg
-33.5
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
4%
Floor%
6%
eFG%
-13%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
-1.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.