ORtg
32.3
19th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Constantine Kouabite N'tcha
Power Forward · BEN · b. 2009
//measurables
178 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRebounder8.5 RPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
8.5 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile
1.0 APGCreation · 51st event percentile
- 3.5
- HESI v2.1
- #137
- of 142
- 62%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #137 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
3.5
Event performance
4th event percentile
PI
15.5
Prospect index
4th event percentile
ORtg
32.3
Points / 100 poss.
19th event percentile
DRtg
80.6
Lower is better
10th event percentile
NRtg
-48.3
Two-way margin
15th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 32.3 · 19th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 80.6 · Stop% 60.2% · Team DRtg 80.2
Sample context
4 games · 99 minutes · 62% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
8.5 RPG92nd event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG51st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
3.5
4th event percentile
Prospect index
15.5
4th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
32.3
19th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.6
10th event percentile
Two-way margin
-48.3
15th event percentile
Stop percentage
60.2%
31st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
1.5 PPG
24th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
8.5 RPG
92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
28th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
27.3% TS
37th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P92
Rebounder
8.5 RPG · 92nd event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 4th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 32.3 ORtg and 80.6 DRtg, producing a -48.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 92nd event percentile
Rebounding
8.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 10th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.6 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 15th event percentile
Two-way margin
-48.3 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 19th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
32.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
1.5 PPG
24th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
27.3%
37th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
27.3%
42nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
27.3%
50th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.5 attempts per game
Floor%
16.1%
20th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
80.6
10th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.4
60th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
60.2%
31st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
28th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
30.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-48.3
15th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-33.3
4th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
3.5
4th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
15.5
4th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.5%
62nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.5 RPG
92nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
98.7
context24.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#137
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
406.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
1.5
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.0
APG
#137
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#7
RANK
20
FIELD
68%
PERCENTILE
0.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#137/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.5
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.0
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.5
P24
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
8.5
P92
True shooting
27%
P37
Two-way impact
-48.3
P15
Stops
60%
P31
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
3 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
18% of attempts from three
●2PA 9●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
6
PTS
1.5 / game
3–11
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
14
TOV
3.5 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
34
REB
8.5 / game
12
OREB
22
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
3.5
HESI
15.5
PI
32.3
ORtg
80.6
DRtg
-48.3
NRtg
-33.3
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
16%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
4%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
-0.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#7/20view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.0
PPG
6.0
RPG
1.5
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
0%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.0
P18
Playmaking
1.5
P78
Rebounding
6.0
P68
True shooting
0%
P9
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
25% of attempts from three
●2PA 3●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
0
PTS
0.0 / game
0–4
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
1.5 / game
3
TOV
1.5 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
12
REB
6.0 / game
4
OREB
8
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
2.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
5
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
0%
eFG%
19%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#135
#136
#138
Central African Republic
2.4 PPG 12.6 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalRebounder12.6 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity12.6 RPG + 2.2 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
2
GP
0.0
PPG
6.0
RPG
1.5
APG
2.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
0%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #137
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.5
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.0
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.5
P24
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
8.5
P92
True shooting
27%
P37
Two-way impact
-48.3
P15
Stops
60%
P31
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
3 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
18% of attempts from three
●2PA 9●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
6
PTS
1.5 / game
3–11
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
14
TOV
3.5 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
34
REB
8.5 / game
12
OREB
22
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
3.5
HESI
15.5
PI
32.3
ORtg
80.6
DRtg
-48.3
NRtg
-33.3
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
16%
Floor%
27%
eFG%
4%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
-0.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 32026
2 GP · event rank #7
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.0
PPG
6.0
RPG
1.5
APG
1.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
0%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.0
P18
Playmaking
1.5
P78
Rebounding
6.0
P68
True shooting
0%
P9
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 4 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
25% of attempts from three
●2PA 3●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
0
PTS
0.0 / game
0–4
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
0–2
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
1.5 / game
3
TOV
1.5 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
12
REB
6.0 / game
4
OREB
8
DREB
6.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
2.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
5
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
0%
eFG%
19%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.