Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Melvina KOKERANG

CAF · b. 2008

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

12.6 RPGRebounding · 98th event percentile

2.2 stocksDefensive activity · 65th event percentile

4.3
HESI v2.1: #138
of 142: 70%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #138 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

4.3

Event performance

5th event percentile

14.9

Prospect index

3rd event percentile

ORtg

21.9

Points / 100 poss.

10th event percentile

DRtg

65.7

Lower is better

45th event percentile

NRtg

-43.8

Two-way margin

17th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 21.9 · 10th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 65.7 · Stop% 81.0% · Team DRtg 72.5

Sample context

5 games · 139 minutes · 70% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

12.6 RPG98th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.2 stocks65th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

4.3

5th event percentile

Prospect index

14.9

3rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

21.9

10th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

65.7

45th event percentile

Two-way margin

-43.8

17th event percentile

Stop percentage

81.0%

85th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.4 PPG

34th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Rebounding

12.6 RPG

98th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.2 stocks

65th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

21.4% TS

18th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P98
Rebounder
12.6 RPG · 98th event percentile
P76
Activity
12.6 RPG + 2.2 defensive plays/G · 76th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 5th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 21.9 ORtg and 65.7 DRtg, producing a -43.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive stops, and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
12.6 RPG
98th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
81.0% Stop%
85th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Defensive activity
2.2 steals + blocks/G
65th event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

Offensive efficiency
21.9 ORtg
10th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Two-way margin
-43.8 NRtg
17th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Scoring efficiency
21.4% TS
18th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

21.9

10th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.4 PPG

34th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

21.4%

18th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

19.0%

22nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

19.0%

26th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

25.0%

15th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

12.2%

11th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

65.7

45th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

72.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+6.7

93rd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

81.0%

85th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.2 STL+BLK

65th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

62.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-43.8

17th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-33.2

5th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

4.3

5th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

14.9

3rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-6.3%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

12.6 RPG

98th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

138.8

context

27.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#138

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

552.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

2.4

PPG

12.6

RPG

1.0

APG

#138

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#138/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.4

PPG

12.6

RPG

1.0

APG

7.8

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

21%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.4

P34

Playmaking

1.0

P51

Rebounding

12.6

P98

True shooting

21%

P18

Two-way impact

-43.8

P17

Stops

81%

P85

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

19%

4 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Free throws

25%

4 made / 16 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 21●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.4 / game

4–21

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

4–16

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

7.8 / game

0.13×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

12.6 / game

OREB

DREB

12.6

REB/G

defense

STL

2.0 / game

BLK

0.2 / game

STL+BLK

2.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

4.3

HESI

14.9

21.9

ORtg

65.7

DRtg

-43.8

NRtg

-33.2

Stable NRtg

81%

Stop%

12%

Floor%

19%

eFG%

-6%

PIE

72.5

Team DRtg

+6.7

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #137Constantine Kouabite N'tchaPF · Benin

//current_rank

#138

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #139Namiga Alexandra KassaBenin

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

2.4

PPG

12.6

RPG

1.0

APG

2.0

SPG

0.2

BPG

—

3P%

21%

TS%

event_stats