ORtg
77.1
40th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Katie Moors
NZL · b. 2010
//measurables
187 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalDefensive Impact62.3 DRtg · 105% Stop% · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder6.6 RPG · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity6.6 RPG + 2.4 defensive plays/G · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection0.9 BPG · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
6.6 RPGRebounding · 90th event percentile
2.4 stocksDefensive activity · 85th event percentile
- 73.3
- HESI v2.1
- #51
- of 192
- 64%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #51 of 192 · Established
HESI
73.3
Event performance
73rd event percentile
PI
74.3
Prospect index
74th event percentile
ORtg
77.1
Points / 100 poss.
40th event percentile
DRtg
62.3
Lower is better
96th event percentile
NRtg
+14.9
Two-way margin
73rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 77.1 · 40th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 62.3 · Stop% 1.0% · Team DRtg 80.5
Sample context
7 games · 107 minutes · 64% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
6.6 RPG90th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.4 stocks85th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
73.3
73rd event percentile
Prospect index
74.3
74th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
77.1
40th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
62.3
96th event percentile
Two-way margin
+14.9
73rd event percentile
Stop percentage
104.7%
99th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
1.7 PPG
16th event percentile
Creation
1.4 APG
58th event percentile
Rebounding
6.6 RPG
90th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.4 stocks
85th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
35.8% TS
33rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Defensive Impact
62.3 DRtg · 105% Stop% · 97th event percentile
- P90
Rebounder
6.6 RPG · 90th event percentile
- P86
Activity
6.6 RPG + 2.4 defensive plays/G · 86th event percentile
- P86
Rim Protection
0.9 BPG · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 73rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 77.1 ORtg and 62.3 DRtg, producing a +14.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are scoring load and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Defensive stops
1.0% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 96th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
62.3 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 90th event percentile
Rebounding
6.6 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 16th event percentile
Scoring load
1.7 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 33rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
35.8% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
1.7 PPG
16th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
35.8%
33rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.3%
35th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
33.3%
49th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.3 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
35th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.6%
49th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.4 APG
58th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
62.3
96th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+18.2
99th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
1.0%
99th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.4 STL+BLK
85th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
44.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+14.9
73rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+9.6
73rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
73.3
73rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
74.3
74th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.0%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.6 RPG
90th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
107.4
context15.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#51
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
550.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
1.7
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.4
APG
#51
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#51/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.7
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.4
APG
1.1
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.7
P16
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
6.6
P90
True shooting
36%
P33
Two-way impact
+14.9
P73
Stops
1%
P99
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
5 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
13% of attempts from three
●2PA 13●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
1.7 / game
5–15
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
8
TOV
1.1 / game
1.25×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
46
REB
6.6 / game
9
OREB
37
DREB
6.6
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.6 / game
6
BLK
0.9 / game
8
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.3
HESI
74.3
PI
77.1
ORtg
62.3
DRtg
+14.9
NRtg
+9.6
Stable NRtg
1%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
7%
PIE
80.5
Team DRtg
+18.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #50Elizabeth AbubakarSpainrank_below · #52Madara SakalovaLAT
//current_rank
#51
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#49
#50
#52
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
1.7
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.4
APG
1.6
SPG
0.9
BPG
0%
3P%
36%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #51
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.7
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.4
APG
1.1
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.7
P16
Playmaking
1.4
P58
Rebounding
6.6
P90
True shooting
36%
P33
Two-way impact
+14.9
P73
Stops
1%
P99
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
33%
5 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
13% of attempts from three
●2PA 13●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
1.7 / game
5–15
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.4 / game
8
TOV
1.1 / game
1.25×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
46
REB
6.6 / game
9
OREB
37
DREB
6.6
REB/G
defense
11
STL
1.6 / game
6
BLK
0.9 / game
8
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.3
HESI
74.3
PI
77.1
ORtg
62.3
DRtg
+14.9
NRtg
+9.6
Stable NRtg
1%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
7%
PIE
80.5
Team DRtg
+18.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.