ORtg
105.5
86th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Ema Lorbek
SLO · b. 2010
//measurables
194 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact105.5 ORtg · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
58.4% TSScoring efficiency · 95th event percentile
7.9 PPGScoring load · 75th event percentile
- 73.8
- HESI v2.1
- #49
- of 192
- 66%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #49 of 192 · Established
HESI
73.8
Event performance
74th event percentile
PI
74.8
Prospect index
75th event percentile
ORtg
105.5
Points / 100 poss.
86th event percentile
DRtg
90.7
Lower is better
21st event percentile
NRtg
+14.7
Two-way margin
73rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 105.5 · 86th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 90.7 · Stop% 53.5% · Team DRtg 88.0
Sample context
7 games · 116 minutes · 66% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
58.4% TS95th event percentile
Scoring load
7.9 PPG75th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
73.8
74th event percentile
Prospect index
74.8
75th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
105.5
86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.7
21st event percentile
Two-way margin
+14.7
73rd event percentile
Stop percentage
53.5%
39th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.9 PPG
75th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
34th event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
28th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
61st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.4% TS
95th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P86
Offensive Impact
105.5 ORtg · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 74th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 105.5 ORtg and 90.7 DRtg, producing a +14.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, rebounding, and creation.
Relative strengths
- 95th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.4% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 86th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
105.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 75th event percentile
Scoring load
7.9 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 21st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.7 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 28th event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 34th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.9 PPG
75th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
58.4%
95th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
48.6%
93rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
50.0%
context0.3 attempts per game
Free throws
78.3%
82nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
51.1%
90th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.7 APG
34th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
90.7
21st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.7
47th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
53.5%
39th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
61st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
22.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+14.7
73rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+9.8
74th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
73.8
74th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
74.8
75th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.2%
73rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.0 RPG
28th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
116.2
context16.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
66.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#49
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
512.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
7.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.7
APG
#49
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#49/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.7
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.9
P75
Playmaking
0.7
P34
Rebounding
2.0
P28
True shooting
58%
P95
Two-way impact
+14.7
P73
Stops
53%
P39
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
49%
18 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
18 made / 23 attempts
Shot selection
5% of attempts from three
●2PA 35●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
55
PTS
7.9 / game
18–37
FGM–FGA
1–2
3PM–3PA
18–23
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.7 / game
10
TOV
1.4 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
19
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.0 / game
2
OREB
12
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
15
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.8
HESI
74.8
PI
105.5
ORtg
90.7
DRtg
+14.7
NRtg
+9.8
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
51%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
5%
PIE
88.0
Team DRtg
-2.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#47
#48
CHN
20.3 PPG 3.0 RPG 2.9 APG
//event_signalScorer20.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#50
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
7.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.7
APG
0.6
SPG
0.7
BPG
50%
3P%
58%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #49
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.9
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.7
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.9
P75
Playmaking
0.7
P34
Rebounding
2.0
P28
True shooting
58%
P95
Two-way impact
+14.7
P73
Stops
53%
P39
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
49%
18 made / 37 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
18 made / 23 attempts
Shot selection
5% of attempts from three
●2PA 35●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
55
PTS
7.9 / game
18–37
FGM–FGA
1–2
3PM–3PA
18–23
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.7 / game
10
TOV
1.4 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
19
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.0 / game
2
OREB
12
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
15
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.8
HESI
74.8
PI
105.5
ORtg
90.7
DRtg
+14.7
NRtg
+9.8
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
51%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
5%
PIE
88.0
Team DRtg
-2.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.