Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Elizabeth Abubakar portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Elizabeth Abubakar

ESP · b. 2009

//measurables

187 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

3.2 RPGRebounding · 58th event percentile

0.8 stocksDefensive activity · 47th event percentile

74.9
HESI v2.1
#50
of 192
57%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #50 of 192 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

74.9

Event performance

75th event percentile

PI

74.4

Prospect index

74th event percentile

ORtg

88.7

Points / 100 poss.

60th event percentile

DRtg

71.6

Lower is better

85th event percentile

NRtg

+17.0

Two-way margin

77th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 88.7 · 60th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 71.6 · Stop% 50.3% · Team DRtg 63.6

Sample context

6 games · 81 minutes · 57% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

3.2 RPG58th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.8 stocks47th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

74.9

75th event percentile

Prospect index

74.4

74th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

88.7

60th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

71.6

85th event percentile

Two-way margin

+17.0

77th event percentile

Stop percentage

50.3%

28th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.0 PPG

21st event percentile

Creation

0.7 APG

29th event percentile

Rebounding

3.2 RPG

58th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.8 stocks

47th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

38.4% TS

41st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 75th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 88.7 ORtg and 71.6 DRtg, producing a +17.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, defensive stops, and creation.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive efficiency

    71.6 DRtg

    85th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  2. Two-way margin

    +17.0 NRtg

    77th event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Scoring load

    2.0 PPG

    21st event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  2. Defensive stops

    50.3% Stop%

    28th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  3. Creation

    0.7 APG

    29th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

88.7

60th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.0 PPG

21st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

38.4%

41st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

38.5%

51st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.5%

66th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

33.3%

16th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

45.0%

76th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.7 APG

29th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

71.6

85th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

63.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-8.0

6th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

50.3%

28th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.8 STL+BLK

47th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

15.3

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+17.0

77th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+9.8

75th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

74.9

75th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

74.4

74th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.6%

26th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.2 RPG

58th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

80.5

context

13.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

57.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#50

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

530.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

6

GP

2.0

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.7

APG

#50

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#50/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.0

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.7

APG

0.7

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

38%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.0

P21

Playmaking

0.7

P29

Rebounding

3.2

P58

True shooting

38%

P41

Two-way impact

+17.0

P77

Stops

50%

P28

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

5 made / 13 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

2 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 13●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

12

PTS

2.0 / game

5–13

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

2–6

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

0.7 / game

4

TOV

0.7 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

7

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.2 / game

13

OREB

6

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.3 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

13

PF

5

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

74.9

HESI

74.4

PI

88.7

ORtg

71.6

DRtg

+17.0

NRtg

+9.8

Stable NRtg

50%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

39%

eFG%

1%

PIE

63.6

Team DRtg

-8.0

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games81 minutes13.4 min/game57% sample weightrank #50 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #49Ema LorbekSLO

//current_rank

#50

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #51Katie MoorsNZL
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Yuanshan Li portrait#48

    Yuanshan Li

    CHN

    20.3 PPG 3.0 RPG 2.9 APG

    //event_signalScorer20.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Ema Lorbek portrait#49

    Ema Lorbek

    SLO

    7.9 PPG 2.0 RPG 0.7 APG

  • Katie Moors portrait#51

    Katie Moors

    NZL

    1.7 PPG 6.6 RPG 1.4 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

2.0

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.7

APG

0.3

SPG

0.5

BPG

—

3P%

38%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #50

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.0

PPG

3.2

RPG

0.7

APG

0.7

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

38%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.0

P21

Playmaking

0.7

P29

Rebounding

3.2

P58

True shooting

38%

P41

Two-way impact

+17.0

P77

Stops

50%

P28

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

5 made / 13 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

2 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 13●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

12

PTS

2.0 / game

5–13

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

2–6

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

0.7 / game

4

TOV

0.7 / game

1.00×

AST:TOV

7

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.2 / game

13

OREB

6

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

2

STL

0.3 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

13

PF

5

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

74.9

HESI

74.4

PI

88.7

ORtg

71.6

DRtg

+17.0

NRtg

+9.8

Stable NRtg

50%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

39%

eFG%

1%

PIE

63.6

Team DRtg

-8.0

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games81 minutes13.4 min/game57% sample weightrank #50 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.