back_to_rankings
Yuanshan Li portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Yuanshan Li

CHN · b. 2009

//measurables

178 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalScorer20.3 PPG · 100th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

20.3 PPGScoring load · 99th event percentile

2.9 APGCreation · 89th event percentile

75.9
HESI v2.1
#48
of 192
80%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #48 of 192 · High confidence

HESI v2.1

HESI

75.9

Event performance

76th event percentile

PI

75.2

Prospect index

75th event percentile

ORtg

101.6

Points / 100 poss.

80th event percentile

DRtg

88.2

Lower is better

30th event percentile

NRtg

+13.4

Two-way margin

71st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 101.6 · 80th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.2 · Stop% 54.1% · Team DRtg 85.4

Sample context

7 games · 240 minutes · 80% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Scoring load and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

20.3 PPG99th event percentile

Creation

2.9 APG89th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  2. 02

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

75.9

76th event percentile

Prospect index

75.2

75th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

101.6

80th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.2

30th event percentile

Two-way margin

+13.4

71st event percentile

Stop percentage

54.1%

40th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

20.3 PPG

99th event percentile

Creation

2.9 APG

89th event percentile

Rebounding

3.0 RPG

55th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.9 stocks

83rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

47.1% TS

71st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P100

    Scorer

    20.3 PPG · 100th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 76th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 101.6 ORtg and 88.2 DRtg, producing a +13.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, creation, and defensive activity. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring load

    20.3 PPG

    99th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  2. Creation

    2.9 APG

    89th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  3. Defensive activity

    2.9 steals + blocks/G

    83rd event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    88.2 DRtg

    30th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

101.6

80th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

20.3 PPG

99th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

47.1%

71st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

44.5%

70th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.0%

64th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

23.4%

context

11.0 attempts per game

Free throws

64.5%

59th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

45.3%

78th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.9 APG

89th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.2

30th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

85.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-2.8

45th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

54.1%

40th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.9 STL+BLK

83rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

49.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+13.4

71st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+10.8

76th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

75.9

76th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

75.2

75th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

12.1%

96th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.0 RPG

55th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

240.4

context

34.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

80.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

High confidence

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#48

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

530.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

20.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.9

APG

#48

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#48/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

20.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.9

APG

1.9

TOV/G

2.6

3PM/G

47%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

20.3

P100

Playmaking

2.9

P89

Rebounding

3.0

P55

True shooting

47%

P71

Two-way impact

+13.4

P71

Stops

54%

P40

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

52 made / 137 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

23%

18 made / 77 attempts

FT

Free throws

65%

20 made / 31 attempts

Shot selection

56% of attempts from three

2PA 603PA 77

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

142

PTS

20.3 / game

52–137

FGM–FGA

18–77

3PM–3PA

20–31

FTM–FTA

creation

20

AST

2.9 / game

13

TOV

1.9 / game

1.54×

AST:TOV

25

FD

rebounding

21

REB

3.0 / game

8

OREB

13

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

16

STL

2.3 / game

4

BLK

0.6 / game

6

PF

20

STL+BLK

2.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

75.9

HESI

75.2

PI

101.6

ORtg

88.2

DRtg

+13.4

NRtg

+10.8

Stable NRtg

54%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

45%

eFG%

12%

PIE

85.4

Team DRtg

-2.8

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games240 minutes34.3 min/game80% sample weightrank #48 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Jasmine Jones portrait#46

    Jasmine Jones

    AUS

    3.6 PPG 2.6 RPG 2.0 APG

  • Mia Wiegand portrait#47

    Mia Wiegand

    GER

    12.3 PPG 4.9 RPG 3.1 APG

  • Ema Lorbek portrait#49

    Ema Lorbek

    SLO

    7.9 PPG 2.0 RPG 0.7 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

20.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.9

APG

2.3

SPG

0.6

BPG

23%

3P%

47%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #48

//quick_read

The line at a glance

20.3

PPG

3.0

RPG

2.9

APG

1.9

TOV/G

2.6

3PM/G

47%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

20.3

P100

Playmaking

2.9

P89

Rebounding

3.0

P55

True shooting

47%

P71

Two-way impact

+13.4

P71

Stops

54%

P40

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

52 made / 137 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

23%

18 made / 77 attempts

FT

Free throws

65%

20 made / 31 attempts

Shot selection

56% of attempts from three

2PA 603PA 77

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

142

PTS

20.3 / game

52–137

FGM–FGA

18–77

3PM–3PA

20–31

FTM–FTA

creation

20

AST

2.9 / game

13

TOV

1.9 / game

1.54×

AST:TOV

25

FD

rebounding

21

REB

3.0 / game

8

OREB

13

DREB

3.0

REB/G

defense

16

STL

2.3 / game

4

BLK

0.6 / game

6

PF

20

STL+BLK

2.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

75.9

HESI

75.2

PI

101.6

ORtg

88.2

DRtg

+13.4

NRtg

+10.8

Stable NRtg

54%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

45%

eFG%

12%

PIE

85.4

Team DRtg

-2.8

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games240 minutes34.3 min/game80% sample weightrank #48 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.