back_to_rankings
Mia Wiegand portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Mia Wiegand

GER · b. 2009

//measurables

180 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalCreator3.1 APG · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer12.3 PPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency55% TS on 12.3 PPG · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

3.1 APGCreation · 93rd event percentile

12.3 PPGScoring load · 92nd event percentile

76.4
HESI v2.1
#47
of 192
75%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #47 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

76.4

Event performance

76th event percentile

PI

75.7

Prospect index

76th event percentile

ORtg

83.5

Points / 100 poss.

50th event percentile

DRtg

68.4

Lower is better

90th event percentile

NRtg

+15.1

Two-way margin

74th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 83.5 · 50th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 68.4 · Stop% 68.5% · Team DRtg 69.5

Sample context

7 games · 184 minutes · 75% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

3.1 APG93rd event percentile

Scoring load

12.3 PPG92nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

76.4

76th event percentile

Prospect index

75.7

76th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

83.5

50th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

68.4

90th event percentile

Two-way margin

+15.1

74th event percentile

Stop percentage

68.5%

78th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.3 PPG

92nd event percentile

Creation

3.1 APG

93rd event percentile

Rebounding

4.9 RPG

78th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks

71st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

55.0% TS

88th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P93

    Creator

    3.1 APG · 93rd event percentile

  • P92

    Scorer

    12.3 PPG · 92nd event percentile

  • P88

    Event Efficiency

    55% TS on 12.3 PPG · 88th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 76th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 83.5 ORtg and 68.4 DRtg, producing a +15.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    3.1 APG

    93rd event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Scoring load

    12.3 PPG

    92nd event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Defensive efficiency

    68.4 DRtg

    90th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

83.5

50th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.3 PPG

92nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

55.0%

88th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

50.7%

90th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

41.7%

81st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

34.2%

context

5.4 attempts per game

Free throws

92.9%

91st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

34.7%

38th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.1 APG

93rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

68.4

90th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

69.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+1.1

75th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

68.5%

78th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.3 STL+BLK

71st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

51.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+15.1

74th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+11.5

76th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

76.4

76th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

75.7

76th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

14.6%

91st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.9 RPG

78th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

183.6

context

26.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

75.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#47

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

575.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

12.3

PPG

4.9

RPG

3.1

APG

#47

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#47/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.3

PPG

4.9

RPG

3.1

APG

4.9

TOV/G

1.9

3PM/G

55%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.3

P92

Playmaking

3.1

P93

Rebounding

4.9

P78

True shooting

55%

P88

Two-way impact

+15.1

P74

Stops

69%

P78

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

42%

30 made / 72 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

34%

13 made / 38 attempts

FT

Free throws

93%

13 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

53% of attempts from three

2PA 343PA 38

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

86

PTS

12.3 / game

30–72

FGM–FGA

13–38

3PM–3PA

13–14

FTM–FTA

creation

22

AST

3.1 / game

34

TOV

4.9 / game

0.65×

AST:TOV

12

FD

rebounding

34

REB

4.9 / game

7

OREB

27

DREB

4.9

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.0 / game

2

BLK

0.3 / game

11

PF

16

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

76.4

HESI

75.7

PI

83.5

ORtg

68.4

DRtg

+15.1

NRtg

+11.5

Stable NRtg

69%

Stop%

35%

Floor%

51%

eFG%

15%

PIE

69.5

Team DRtg

+1.1

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games184 minutes26.2 min/game75% sample weightrank #47 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Marta Arsentjeva portrait#45

    Marta Arsentjeva

    LAT

    5.3 PPG 3.9 RPG 0.6 APG

  • Jasmine Jones portrait#46

    Jasmine Jones

    AUS

    3.6 PPG 2.6 RPG 2.0 APG

  • Yuanshan Li portrait#48

    Yuanshan Li

    CHN

    20.3 PPG 3.0 RPG 2.9 APG

    //event_signalScorer20.3 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

12.3

PPG

4.9

RPG

3.1

APG

2.0

SPG

0.3

BPG

34%

3P%

55%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #47

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.3

PPG

4.9

RPG

3.1

APG

4.9

TOV/G

1.9

3PM/G

55%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.3

P92

Playmaking

3.1

P93

Rebounding

4.9

P78

True shooting

55%

P88

Two-way impact

+15.1

P74

Stops

69%

P78

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

42%

30 made / 72 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

34%

13 made / 38 attempts

FT

Free throws

93%

13 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

53% of attempts from three

2PA 343PA 38

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

86

PTS

12.3 / game

30–72

FGM–FGA

13–38

3PM–3PA

13–14

FTM–FTA

creation

22

AST

3.1 / game

34

TOV

4.9 / game

0.65×

AST:TOV

12

FD

rebounding

34

REB

4.9 / game

7

OREB

27

DREB

4.9

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.0 / game

2

BLK

0.3 / game

11

PF

16

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

76.4

HESI

75.7

PI

83.5

ORtg

68.4

DRtg

+15.1

NRtg

+11.5

Stable NRtg

69%

Stop%

35%

Floor%

51%

eFG%

15%

PIE

69.5

Team DRtg

+1.1

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games184 minutes26.2 min/game75% sample weightrank #47 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.