ORtg
72.6
69th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
CIV · b. 2009
//measurables
184 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
51.1% TSScoring efficiency · 98th event percentile
3.2 stocksDefensive activity · 82nd event percentile
Performance
2 rated events
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
Final report on file
Human evaluation is clearly labeled
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #17 of 142 · Established
HESI
88.7
Event performance
88th event percentile
PI
83.6
Prospect index
88th event percentile
ORtg
72.6
Points / 100 poss.
69th event percentile
DRtg
41.4
Lower is better
94th event percentile
NRtg
+31.3
Two-way margin
87th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 72.6 · 69th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 41.4 · Stop% 79.8% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
6 games · 129 minutes · 68% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
88.7
88th event percentile
Prospect index
83.6
88th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
72.6
69th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
41.4
94th event percentile
Two-way margin
+31.3
87th event percentile
Stop percentage
79.8%
83rd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
8.0 PPG
80th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
13th event percentile
Rebounding
6.2 RPG
81st event percentile
Defensive activity
3.2 stocks
82nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
51.1% TS
98th event percentile
//rated_event_history
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Event Efficiency
51% TS on 8.0 PPG · 98th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 91st event percentile
Defensive Impact
41.4 DRtg · 80% Stop% · 89th event percentile
Event Impact
88.7 HESI performance · 88th event percentile
Activity
6.2 RPG + 3.2 defensive plays/G · 81st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 88th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 72.6 ORtg and 41.4 DRtg, producing a +31.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is creation.
Scoring efficiency
51.1% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Defensive efficiency
41.4 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Two-way margin
+31.3 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
72.6
69th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
8.0 PPG
80th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
51.1%
98th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
98th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
50.0%
98th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
47.1%
40th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.1%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
13th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
41.4
94th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.3
67th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
79.8%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.2 STL+BLK
82nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
46.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+31.3
87th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+18.6
88th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
88.7
88th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
83.6
88th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
13.8%
71st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.2 RPG
81st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
129.1
context21.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#17
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
2026-09-08
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
10.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.7
APG
#171
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#17
RANK
142
FIELD
89%
PERCENTILE
8.0
PPG
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
10.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.7
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.3
P85
Playmaking
0.7
P34
Rebounding
5.0
P80
True shooting
40%
P45
Two-way impact
-30.3
P18
Stops
60%
P61
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
35%
22 made / 63 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
46%
28 made / 61 attempts
Shot selection
3% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
72
PTS
10.3 / game
22–63
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
28–61
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.7 / game
23
TOV
3.3 / game
0.22×
AST:TOV
47
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.0 / game
10
OREB
25
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
24
PF
20
STL+BLK
2.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
11.5
HESI
23.7
PI
67.9
ORtg
98.2
DRtg
-30.3
NRtg
-23.0
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
1%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
+2.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
8.0
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.0
P80
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
6.2
P81
True shooting
51%
P98
Two-way impact
+31.3
P87
Stops
80%
P83
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
50%
16 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
16 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
48
PTS
8.0 / game
16–32
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
16–34
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
23
TOV
3.8 / game
0.04×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
37
REB
6.2 / game
17
OREB
20
DREB
6.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
20
PF
19
STL+BLK
3.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
88.7
HESI
83.6
PI
72.6
ORtg
41.4
DRtg
+31.3
NRtg
+18.6
Stable NRtg
80%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
14%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+0.3
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
04
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
8.0
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
2.2
SPG
1.0
BPG
—
3P%
51%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #171
//quick_read
10.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.7
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
10.3
P85
Playmaking
0.7
P34
Rebounding
5.0
P80
True shooting
40%
P45
Two-way impact
-30.3
P18
Stops
60%
P61
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
35%
22 made / 63 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
46%
28 made / 61 attempts
Shot selection
3% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
72
PTS
10.3 / game
22–63
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
28–61
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.7 / game
23
TOV
3.3 / game
0.22×
AST:TOV
47
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.0 / game
10
OREB
25
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
24
PF
20
STL+BLK
2.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
11.5
HESI
23.7
PI
67.9
ORtg
98.2
DRtg
-30.3
NRtg
-23.0
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
1%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
+2.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #17
//quick_read
8.0
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
8.0
P80
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
6.2
P81
True shooting
51%
P98
Two-way impact
+31.3
P87
Stops
80%
P83
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
50%
16 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
16 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
48
PTS
8.0 / game
16–32
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
16–34
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
23
TOV
3.8 / game
0.04×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
37
REB
6.2 / game
17
OREB
20
DREB
6.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
20
PF
19
STL+BLK
3.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
88.7
HESI
83.6
PI
72.6
ORtg
41.4
DRtg
+31.3
NRtg
+18.6
Stable NRtg
80%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
14%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+0.3
Def. lift
05
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.