ORtg
67.9
30th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Jane Mary Diomande
CIV · b. 2009
//measurables
184 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalDisruptor2.9 steals + blocks per game · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity5.0 RPG + 2.9 defensive plays/G · 84th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
2.9 stocksDefensive activity · 86th event percentile
10.3 PPGScoring load · 85th event percentile
- 11.5
- HESI v2.1
- #171
- of 192
- 76%
- sample weight
Performance
2 rated events
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
Final report on file
Human evaluation is clearly labeled
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #171 of 192 · Established
HESI
11.5
Event performance
12th event percentile
PI
23.7
Prospect index
11th event percentile
ORtg
67.9
Points / 100 poss.
30th event percentile
DRtg
98.2
Lower is better
9th event percentile
NRtg
-30.3
Two-way margin
18th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 67.9 · 30th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 98.2 · Stop% 60.2% · Team DRtg 101.1
Sample context
7 games · 189 minutes · 76% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
2.9 stocks86th event percentile
Scoring load
10.3 PPG85th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
11.5
12th event percentile
Prospect index
23.7
11th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
67.9
30th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
98.2
9th event percentile
Two-way margin
-30.3
18th event percentile
Stop percentage
60.2%
61st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
10.3 PPG
85th event percentile
Creation
0.7 APG
34th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
80th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.9 stocks
86th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
40.1% TS
45th event percentile
//rated_event_history
Every rated competition
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P86
Disruptor
2.9 steals + blocks per game · 86th event percentile
- P84
Activity
5.0 RPG + 2.9 defensive plays/G · 84th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 12th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 67.9 ORtg and 98.2 DRtg, producing a -30.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, scoring load, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 86th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.9 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 85th event percentile
Scoring load
10.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 80th event percentile
Rebounding
5.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 9th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
98.2 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 18th event percentile
Two-way margin
-30.3 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 30th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
67.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
10.3 PPG
85th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
40.1%
45th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
34.9%
40th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
34.9%
54th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.3 attempts per game
Free throws
45.9%
28th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.0%
45th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.7 APG
34th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
98.2
9th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
101.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.9
82nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
60.2%
61st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.9 STL+BLK
86th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
47.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-30.3
18th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-23.0
12th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
11.5
12th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
23.7
11th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
0.6%
26th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.0 RPG
80th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
188.9
context27.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
75.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#171
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
589.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
2026-09-08
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
10.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.7
APG
#171
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#17
RANK
142
FIELD
89%
PERCENTILE
8.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#171/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.7
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.3
P85
Playmaking
0.7
P34
Rebounding
5.0
P80
True shooting
40%
P45
Two-way impact
-30.3
P18
Stops
60%
P61
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
22 made / 63 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
46%
28 made / 61 attempts
Shot selection
3% of attempts from three
●2PA 61●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
72
PTS
10.3 / game
22–63
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
28–61
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.7 / game
23
TOV
3.3 / game
0.22×
AST:TOV
47
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.0 / game
10
OREB
25
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
24
PF
20
STL+BLK
2.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
11.5
HESI
23.7
PI
67.9
ORtg
98.2
DRtg
-30.3
NRtg
-23.0
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
1%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
+2.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#17/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.0
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.0
P80
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
6.2
P81
True shooting
51%
P98
Two-way impact
+31.3
P87
Stops
80%
P83
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
16 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
16 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 32●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
8.0 / game
16–32
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
16–34
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
23
TOV
3.8 / game
0.04×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
37
REB
6.2 / game
17
OREB
20
DREB
6.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
20
PF
19
STL+BLK
3.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
88.7
HESI
83.6
PI
72.6
ORtg
41.4
DRtg
+31.3
NRtg
+18.6
Stable NRtg
80%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
14%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+0.3
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#169
#170
#172
04
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
8.0
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
2.2
SPG
1.0
BPG
—
3P%
51%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #171
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.3
PPG
5.0
RPG
0.7
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.3
P85
Playmaking
0.7
P34
Rebounding
5.0
P80
True shooting
40%
P45
Two-way impact
-30.3
P18
Stops
60%
P61
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
35%
22 made / 63 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
46%
28 made / 61 attempts
Shot selection
3% of attempts from three
●2PA 61●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
72
PTS
10.3 / game
22–63
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
28–61
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.7 / game
23
TOV
3.3 / game
0.22×
AST:TOV
47
FD
rebounding
35
REB
5.0 / game
10
OREB
25
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
24
PF
20
STL+BLK
2.9 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
11.5
HESI
23.7
PI
67.9
ORtg
98.2
DRtg
-30.3
NRtg
-23.0
Stable NRtg
60%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
35%
eFG%
1%
PIE
101.1
Team DRtg
+2.9
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #17
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.0
PPG
6.2
RPG
0.2
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.0
P80
Playmaking
0.2
P13
Rebounding
6.2
P81
True shooting
51%
P98
Two-way impact
+31.3
P87
Stops
80%
P83
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
50%
16 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
16 made / 34 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 32●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
48
PTS
8.0 / game
16–32
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
16–34
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
23
TOV
3.8 / game
0.04×
AST:TOV
23
FD
rebounding
37
REB
6.2 / game
17
OREB
20
DREB
6.2
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
20
PF
19
STL+BLK
3.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
88.7
HESI
83.6
PI
72.6
ORtg
41.4
DRtg
+31.3
NRtg
+18.6
Stable NRtg
80%
Stop%
39%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
14%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+0.3
Def. lift
05
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.