ORtg
99.0
77th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Momoka Kaji
JPN · b. 2009
//measurables
173 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalShooter35% 3PT on 2.4 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
50.0% TSScoring efficiency · 81st event percentile
6.1 PPGScoring load · 63rd event percentile
- 71.2
- HESI v2.1
- #56
- of 192
- 65%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #56 of 192 · Established
HESI
71.2
Event performance
71st event percentile
PI
71.5
Prospect index
71st event percentile
ORtg
99.0
Points / 100 poss.
77th event percentile
DRtg
85.7
Lower is better
43rd event percentile
NRtg
+13.3
Two-way margin
71st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 99.0 · 77th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 85.7 · Stop% 47.7% · Team DRtg 79.1
Sample context
7 games · 109 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
50.0% TS81st event percentile
Scoring load
6.1 PPG63rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
71.2
71st event percentile
Prospect index
71.5
71st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
99.0
77th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
85.7
43rd event percentile
Two-way margin
+13.3
71st event percentile
Stop percentage
47.7%
21st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.1 PPG
63rd event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
24th event percentile
Rebounding
2.1 RPG
32nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.4 stocks
32nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.0% TS
81st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Shooter
35% 3PT on 2.4 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 71st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 99.0 ORtg and 85.7 DRtg, producing a +13.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, creation, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 81st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.0% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 77th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
99.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 71st event percentile
Two-way margin
+13.3 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 21st event percentile
Defensive stops
47.7% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 24th event percentile
Creation
0.6 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 32nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.4 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.1 PPG
63rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
50.0%
81st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
46.2%
77th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
38.5%
66th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
35.3%
context2.4 attempts per game
Free throws
77.8%
81st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.7%
68th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.6 APG
24th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
85.7
43rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
79.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.6
15th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
47.7%
21st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.4 STL+BLK
32nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
18.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+13.3
71st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+8.7
71st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
71.2
71st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
71.5
71st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.7%
67th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.1 RPG
32nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
109.4
context15.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
64.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#56
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
506.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
6.1
PPG
2.1
RPG
0.6
APG
#56
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#56/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.1
PPG
2.1
RPG
0.6
APG
0.7
TOV/G
0.9
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.1
P63
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
2.1
P32
True shooting
50%
P81
Two-way impact
+13.3
P71
Stops
48%
P21
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
15 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
35%
6 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
7 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
44% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
43
PTS
6.1 / game
15–39
FGM–FGA
6–17
3PM–3PA
7–9
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
0.80×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
15
REB
2.1 / game
4
OREB
11
DREB
2.1
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
5
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
71.2
HESI
71.5
PI
99.0
ORtg
85.7
DRtg
+13.3
NRtg
+8.7
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
5%
PIE
79.1
Team DRtg
-6.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#54
NZL
9.4 PPG 2.4 RPG 2.7 APG
//event_signalShooter38% 3PT on 6.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#55
#57
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
6.1
PPG
2.1
RPG
0.6
APG
0.3
SPG
0.1
BPG
35%
3P%
50%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #56
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.1
PPG
2.1
RPG
0.6
APG
0.7
TOV/G
0.9
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.1
P63
Playmaking
0.6
P24
Rebounding
2.1
P32
True shooting
50%
P81
Two-way impact
+13.3
P71
Stops
48%
P21
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
15 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
35%
6 made / 17 attempts
FT
Free throws
78%
7 made / 9 attempts
Shot selection
44% of attempts from three
●2PA 22●3PA 17
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
43
PTS
6.1 / game
15–39
FGM–FGA
6–17
3PM–3PA
7–9
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
0.6 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
0.80×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
15
REB
2.1 / game
4
OREB
11
DREB
2.1
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.3 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
5
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
71.2
HESI
71.5
PI
99.0
ORtg
85.7
DRtg
+13.3
NRtg
+8.7
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
46%
eFG%
5%
PIE
79.1
Team DRtg
-6.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.