Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Charis Broughton

NZL · b. 2009

//measurables

169 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

2.7 APGCreation · 86th event percentile

9.4 PPGScoring load · 82nd event percentile

72.3
HESI v2.1: #54
of 192: 71%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #54 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

72.3

Event performance

72nd event percentile

72.3

Prospect index

72nd event percentile

ORtg

101.6

Points / 100 poss.

81st event percentile

DRtg

88.5

Lower is better

27th event percentile

NRtg

+13.1

Two-way margin

70th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 101.6 · 81st event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.5 · Stop% 46.0% · Team DRtg 80.5

Sample context

7 games · 148 minutes · 71% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.7 APG86th event percentile

Scoring load

9.4 PPG82nd event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

72.3

72nd event percentile

Prospect index

72.3

72nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

101.6

81st event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.5

27th event percentile

Two-way margin

+13.1

70th event percentile

Stop percentage

46.0%

14th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

9.4 PPG

82nd event percentile

Creation

2.7 APG

86th event percentile

Rebounding

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.6 stocks

30th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

49.5% TS

78th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

Shooter
38% 3PT on 6.0 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 72nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 101.6 ORtg and 88.5 DRtg, producing a +13.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

Creation
2.7 APG
86th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
9.4 PPG
82nd event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
101.6 ORtg
81st event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
46.0% Stop%
14th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
88.5 DRtg
27th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive activity
0.6 steals + blocks/G
30th event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

101.6

81st event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

9.4 PPG

82nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

49.5%

78th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

49.2%

84th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

36.1%

59th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

38.1%

context

6.0 attempts per game

Free throws

46.2%

28th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

41.1%

61st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.7 APG

86th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.5

27th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

80.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-8.0

7th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

46.0%

14th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.6 STL+BLK

30th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

26.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+13.1

70th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+9.4

72nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

72.3

72nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

72.3

72nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.8%

80th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

147.6

context

21.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

71.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#54

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

550.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

9.4

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.7

APG

#54

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#54/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.4

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.7

APG

1.6

TOV/G

2.3

3PM/G

50%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.4

P82

Playmaking

2.7

P86

Rebounding

2.4

P39

True shooting

50%

P78

Two-way impact

+13.1

P70

Stops

46%

P14

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

36%

22 made / 61 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

38%

16 made / 42 attempts

Free throws

46%

6 made / 13 attempts

Shot selection

69% of attempts from three

●2PA 19●3PA 42

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

9.4 / game

22–61

FGM–FGA

16–42

3PM–3PA

6–13

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.7 / game

TOV

1.6 / game

1.73×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.4 / game

OREB

DREB

2.4

REB/G

defense

STL

0.6 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

72.3

HESI

72.3

101.6

ORtg

88.5

DRtg

+13.1

NRtg

+9.4

Stable NRtg

46%

Stop%

41%

Floor%

49%

eFG%

PIE

80.5

Team DRtg

-8.0

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #53Ines FritzSLO

//current_rank

#54

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #55Mathilda HaenschGER

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

9.4

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.7

APG

0.6

SPG

0.0

BPG

38%

3P%

50%

TS%

event_stats