Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Mathilda Haensch

GER · b. 2009

//measurables

190 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

1.7 stocksDefensive activity · 70th event percentile

43.9% TSScoring efficiency · 57th event percentile

71.7
HESI v2.1: #55
of 192: 67%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #55 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

71.7

Event performance

72nd event percentile

71.9

Prospect index

72nd event percentile

ORtg

87.0

Points / 100 poss.

57th event percentile

DRtg

73.7

Lower is better

81st event percentile

NRtg

+13.3

Two-way margin

70th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 87.0 · 57th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 73.7 · Stop% 55.4% · Team DRtg 69.5

Sample context

7 games · 121 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks70th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

43.9% TS57th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

71.7

72nd event percentile

Prospect index

71.9

72nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

87.0

57th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

73.7

81st event percentile

Two-way margin

+13.3

70th event percentile

Stop percentage

55.4%

48th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.6 PPG

27th event percentile

Creation

1.3 APG

53rd event percentile

Rebounding

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

70th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

43.9% TS

57th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P90
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 90th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 72nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 87.0 ORtg and 73.7 DRtg, producing a +13.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive activity, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are scoring load and rebounding.

Relative strengths

Defensive efficiency
73.7 DRtg
81st event percentile
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive activity
1.7 steals + blocks/G
70th event percentile
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Two-way margin
+13.3 NRtg
70th event percentile
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring load
2.6 PPG
27th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Rebounding
2.4 RPG
39th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

87.0

57th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.6 PPG

27th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

43.9%

57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

35.3%

41st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

35.3%

55th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

75.0%

76th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

41.7%

63rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.3 APG

53rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

73.7

81st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

69.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.2

33rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

55.4%

48th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

70th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

27.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+13.3

70th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+8.9

72nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

71.7

72nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

71.9

72nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.0%

45th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

120.8

context

17.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

66.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#55

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

575.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

2.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

1.3

APG

#55

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#55/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

1.3

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

44%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.6

P27

Playmaking

1.3

P53

Rebounding

2.4

P39

True shooting

44%

P57

Two-way impact

+13.3

P70

Stops

55%

P48

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

35%

6 made / 17 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Free throws

75%

6 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.6 / game

6–17

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

6–8

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.3 / game

TOV

1.0 / game

1.29×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.4 / game

OREB

DREB

2.4

REB/G

defense

STL

0.7 / game

BLK

1.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

71.7

HESI

71.9

87.0

ORtg

73.7

DRtg

+13.3

NRtg

+8.9

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

42%

Floor%

35%

eFG%

PIE

69.5

Team DRtg

-4.2

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #54Charis BroughtonNZL

//current_rank

#55

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #56Momoka KajiJPN

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

2.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

1.3

APG

0.7

SPG

1.0

BPG

—

3P%

44%

TS%

event_stats