Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Ines Fritz portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Ines Fritz

SLO · b. 2009

//measurables

180 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalOffensive Impact106.1 ORtg · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

52.1% TSScoring efficiency · 87th event percentile

2.6 APGCreation · 82nd event percentile

72.8
HESI v2.1
#53
of 192
74%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #53 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

72.8

Event performance

73rd event percentile

PI

72.7

Prospect index

73rd event percentile

ORtg

106.1

Points / 100 poss.

87th event percentile

DRtg

93.4

Lower is better

16th event percentile

NRtg

+12.6

Two-way margin

67th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 106.1 · 87th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 93.4 · Stop% 47.3% · Team DRtg 88.0

Sample context

7 games · 175 minutes · 74% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

52.1% TS87th event percentile

Creation

2.6 APG82nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

72.8

73rd event percentile

Prospect index

72.7

73rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

106.1

87th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

93.4

16th event percentile

Two-way margin

+12.6

67th event percentile

Stop percentage

47.3%

18th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.3 PPG

57th event percentile

Creation

2.6 APG

82nd event percentile

Rebounding

2.1 RPG

32nd event percentile

Defensive activity

1.4 stocks

49th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

52.1% TS

87th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P87

    Offensive Impact

    106.1 ORtg · 87th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 73rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 106.1 ORtg and 93.4 DRtg, producing a +12.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

  1. Offensive efficiency

    106.1 ORtg

    87th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    52.1% TS

    87th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

  3. Creation

    2.6 APG

    82nd event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    93.4 DRtg

    16th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  2. Defensive stops

    47.3% Stop%

    18th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  3. Rebounding

    2.1 RPG

    32nd event percentile

    Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

106.1

87th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.3 PPG

57th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

52.1%

87th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

51.6%

91st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

46.9%

88th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

33.3%

context

1.3 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

35th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

49.9%

87th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.6 APG

82nd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

93.4

16th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.4

24th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

47.3%

18th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.4 STL+BLK

49th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.3

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+12.6

67th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+9.4

73rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

72.8

73rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

72.7

73rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.5%

53rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.1 RPG

32nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

175.0

context

25.0 minutes per game.

Sample weight

74.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#53

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

512.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

5.3

PPG

2.1

RPG

2.6

APG

#53

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#53/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.3

PPG

2.1

RPG

2.6

APG

1.1

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

52%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.3

P57

Playmaking

2.6

P82

Rebounding

2.1

P32

True shooting

52%

P87

Two-way impact

+12.6

P67

Stops

47%

P18

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

47%

15 made / 32 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

33%

3 made / 9 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

4 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

28% of attempts from three

●2PA 23●3PA 9

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

37

PTS

5.3 / game

15–32

FGM–FGA

3–9

3PM–3PA

4–8

FTM–FTA

creation

18

AST

2.6 / game

8

TOV

1.1 / game

2.25×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

15

REB

2.1 / game

9

OREB

6

DREB

2.1

REB/G

defense

10

STL

1.4 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

26

PF

10

STL+BLK

1.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

72.8

HESI

72.7

PI

106.1

ORtg

93.4

DRtg

+12.6

NRtg

+9.4

Stable NRtg

47%

Stop%

50%

Floor%

52%

eFG%

3%

PIE

88.0

Team DRtg

-5.4

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games175 minutes25.0 min/game74% sample weightrank #53 of 192
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #52Madara SakalovaLAT

//current_rank

#53

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #54Charis BroughtonNZL
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Katie Moors portrait#51

    Katie Moors

    NZL

    1.7 PPG 6.6 RPG 1.4 APG

  • Madara Sakalova portrait#52

    Madara Sakalova

    LAT

    2.7 PPG 4.3 RPG 0.9 APG

  • Charis Broughton portrait#54

    Charis Broughton

    NZL

    9.4 PPG 2.4 RPG 2.7 APG

    //event_signalShooter38% 3PT on 6.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

7

GP

5.3

PPG

2.1

RPG

2.6

APG

1.4

SPG

0.0

BPG

33%

3P%

52%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #53

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.3

PPG

2.1

RPG

2.6

APG

1.1

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

52%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.3

P57

Playmaking

2.6

P82

Rebounding

2.1

P32

True shooting

52%

P87

Two-way impact

+12.6

P67

Stops

47%

P18

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

47%

15 made / 32 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

33%

3 made / 9 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

4 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

28% of attempts from three

●2PA 23●3PA 9

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

37

PTS

5.3 / game

15–32

FGM–FGA

3–9

3PM–3PA

4–8

FTM–FTA

creation

18

AST

2.6 / game

8

TOV

1.1 / game

2.25×

AST:TOV

10

FD

rebounding

15

REB

2.1 / game

9

OREB

6

DREB

2.1

REB/G

defense

10

STL

1.4 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

26

PF

10

STL+BLK

1.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

72.8

HESI

72.7

PI

106.1

ORtg

93.4

DRtg

+12.6

NRtg

+9.4

Stable NRtg

47%

Stop%

50%

Floor%

52%

eFG%

3%

PIE

88.0

Team DRtg

-5.4

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games175 minutes25.0 min/game74% sample weightrank #53 of 192

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.