ORtg
91.6
64th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Sienna Maurice
NZL · b. 2010
//measurables
180 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator4.3 APG · 97th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
4.3 APGCreation · 97th event percentile
4.3 RPGRebounding · 72nd event percentile
- 65.5
- HESI v2.1
- #66
- of 192
- 72%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #66 of 192 · Established
HESI
65.5
Event performance
65th event percentile
PI
68.1
Prospect index
66th event percentile
ORtg
91.6
Points / 100 poss.
64th event percentile
DRtg
83.2
Lower is better
52nd event percentile
NRtg
+8.4
Two-way margin
63rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 91.6 · 64th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 83.2 · Stop% 57.9% · Team DRtg 80.5
Sample context
7 games · 152 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
4.3 APG97th event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG72nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
65.5
65th event percentile
Prospect index
68.1
66th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
91.6
64th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
83.2
52nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+8.4
63rd event percentile
Stop percentage
57.9%
53rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
45th event percentile
Creation
4.3 APG
97th event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG
72nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
30th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.7% TS
66th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P97
Creator
4.3 APG · 97th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 65th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 91.6 ORtg and 83.2 DRtg, producing a +8.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, rebounding, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative area is defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Creation
4.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 72nd event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
45.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 30th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.0 PPG
45th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
45.7%
66th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.9%
65th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
39.3%
73rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
18.2%
context1.6 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
63rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.0%
65th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
4.3 APG
97th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
83.2
52nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.7
46th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
57.9%
53rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
30th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
34.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+8.4
63rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+6.1
65th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
65.5
65th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
68.1
66th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
7.5%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.3 RPG
72nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
152.2
context21.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
71.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#66
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
550.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
4.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.3
APG
#66
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#66/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.3
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P45
Playmaking
4.3
P97
Rebounding
4.3
P72
True shooting
46%
P66
Two-way impact
+8.4
P63
Stops
58%
P53
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
11 made / 28 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
2 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 11
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
28
PTS
4.0 / game
11–28
FGM–FGA
2–11
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
30
AST
4.3 / game
14
TOV
2.0 / game
2.14×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
30
REB
4.3 / game
4
OREB
26
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
65.5
HESI
68.1
PI
91.6
ORtg
83.2
DRtg
+8.4
NRtg
+6.1
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
8%
PIE
80.5
Team DRtg
-2.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#64
CHN
5.3 PPG 3.9 RPG 6.7 APG
//event_signalCreator6.7 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#65
#67
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
4.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.3
APG
0.6
SPG
0.0
BPG
18%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #66
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
4.3
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P45
Playmaking
4.3
P97
Rebounding
4.3
P72
True shooting
46%
P66
Two-way impact
+8.4
P63
Stops
58%
P53
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
11 made / 28 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
18%
2 made / 11 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
39% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 11
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
28
PTS
4.0 / game
11–28
FGM–FGA
2–11
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
30
AST
4.3 / game
14
TOV
2.0 / game
2.14×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
30
REB
4.3 / game
4
OREB
26
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
65.5
HESI
68.1
PI
91.6
ORtg
83.2
DRtg
+8.4
NRtg
+6.1
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
8%
PIE
80.5
Team DRtg
-2.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.