ORtg
94.9
71st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Honoka Yasui
JPN · b. 2010
//measurables
170 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.7 APGCreation · 84th event percentile
7.3 PPGScoring load · 72nd event percentile
- 64.9
- HESI v2.1
- #67
- of 192
- 44%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #67 of 192 · Limited sample
HESI
64.9
Event performance
65th event percentile
PI
67.6
Prospect index
65th event percentile
ORtg
94.9
Points / 100 poss.
71st event percentile
DRtg
81.4
Lower is better
57th event percentile
NRtg
+13.5
Two-way margin
72nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 94.9 · 71st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 81.4 · Stop% 57.6% · Team DRtg 79.1
Sample context
3 games · 47 minutes · 44% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.7 APG84th event percentile
Scoring load
7.3 PPG72nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
64.9
65th event percentile
Prospect index
67.6
65th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
94.9
71st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.4
57th event percentile
Two-way margin
+13.5
72nd event percentile
Stop percentage
57.6%
52nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.3 PPG
72nd event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
84th event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
19th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.0 stocks
53rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
46.1% TS
68th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 65th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 94.9 ORtg and 81.4 DRtg, producing a +13.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, two-way margin, and scoring load. The lowest relative area is rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 84th event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 72nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+13.5 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 72nd event percentile
Scoring load
7.3 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 19th event percentile
Rebounding
1.7 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.3 PPG
72nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
46.1%
68th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.8%
45th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
31.6%
40th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context4.0 attempts per game
Free throws
72.7%
73rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
43.2%
71st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.7 APG
84th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
81.4
57th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
79.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.3
51st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
57.6%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.0 STL+BLK
53rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
9.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+13.5
72nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+6.0
65th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
64.9
65th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
67.6
65th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.0%
45th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.7 RPG
19th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
46.6
context15.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
43.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#67
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
506.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
3
GP
7.3
PPG
1.7
RPG
2.7
APG
#67
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#67/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.3
PPG
1.7
RPG
2.7
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.3
P72
Playmaking
2.7
P84
Rebounding
1.7
P19
True shooting
46%
P68
Two-way impact
+13.5
P72
Stops
58%
P52
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
6 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
2 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
73%
8 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
63% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
22
PTS
7.3 / game
6–19
FGM–FGA
2–12
3PM–3PA
8–11
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
2.7 / game
4
TOV
1.3 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.7 / game
0
OREB
5
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.7 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
3
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
64.9
HESI
67.6
PI
94.9
ORtg
81.4
DRtg
+13.5
NRtg
+6.0
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
2%
PIE
79.1
Team DRtg
-2.3
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#65
#66
#68
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
7.3
PPG
1.7
RPG
2.7
APG
0.7
SPG
0.3
BPG
17%
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
3 GP · event rank #67
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.3
PPG
1.7
RPG
2.7
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.3
P72
Playmaking
2.7
P84
Rebounding
1.7
P19
True shooting
46%
P68
Two-way impact
+13.5
P72
Stops
58%
P52
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
6 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
2 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
73%
8 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
63% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
22
PTS
7.3 / game
6–19
FGM–FGA
2–12
3PM–3PA
8–11
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
2.7 / game
4
TOV
1.3 / game
2.00×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
5
REB
1.7 / game
0
OREB
5
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
2
STL
0.7 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
3
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
64.9
HESI
67.6
PI
94.9
ORtg
81.4
DRtg
+13.5
NRtg
+6.0
Stable NRtg
58%
Stop%
43%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
2%
PIE
79.1
Team DRtg
-2.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.