Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Imani Rasmussen

NZL · b. 2009

//measurables

191 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

8.0 RPGRebounding · 96th event percentile

11.4 PPGScoring load · 89th event percentile

66.0
HESI v2.1: #68
of 192: 73%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #68 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

66.0

Event performance

66th event percentile

67.3

Prospect index

65th event percentile

ORtg

87.4

Points / 100 poss.

58th event percentile

DRtg

79.2

Lower is better

66th event percentile

NRtg

+8.3

Two-way margin

62nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 87.4 · 58th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 79.2 · Stop% 66.9% · Team DRtg 80.5

Sample context

7 games · 163 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

8.0 RPG96th event percentile

Scoring load

11.4 PPG89th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

66.0

66th event percentile

Prospect index

67.3

65th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

87.4

58th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

79.2

66th event percentile

Two-way margin

+8.3

62nd event percentile

Stop percentage

66.9%

77th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

11.4 PPG

89th event percentile

Creation

1.7 APG

66th event percentile

Rebounding

8.0 RPG

96th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.1 stocks

57th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

43.6% TS

56th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P96
Rebounder
8.0 RPG · 96th event percentile
P89
Scorer
11.4 PPG · 89th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 66th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 87.4 ORtg and 79.2 DRtg, producing a +8.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
8.0 RPG
96th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
11.4 PPG
89th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Defensive stops
66.9% Stop%
77th event percentile
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

87.4

58th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

11.4 PPG

89th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

43.6%

56th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

37.5%

48th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

37.5%

63rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.1 attempts per game

Free throws

57.8%

47th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

44.9%

76th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.7 APG

66th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

79.2

66th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

80.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+1.3

76th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

66.9%

77th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.1 STL+BLK

57th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

42.9

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+8.3

62nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+6.1

66th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

66.0

66th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

67.3

65th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.1%

80th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

8.0 RPG

96th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

163.2

context

23.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#68

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

550.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

11.4

PPG

8.0

RPG

1.7

APG

#68

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#68/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.4

PPG

8.0

RPG

1.7

APG

2.9

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

44%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.4

P89

Playmaking

1.7

P66

Rebounding

8.0

P96

True shooting

44%

P56

Two-way impact

+8.3

P62

Stops

67%

P77

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

38%

27 made / 72 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 1 attempts

Free throws

58%

26 made / 45 attempts

Shot selection

1% of attempts from three

●2PA 71●3PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

11.4 / game

27–72

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

26–45

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.7 / game

TOV

2.9 / game

0.60×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

8.0 / game

OREB

DREB

8.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.6 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

1.1 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

66.0

HESI

67.3

87.4

ORtg

79.2

DRtg

+8.3

NRtg

+6.1

Stable NRtg

67%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

38%

eFG%

PIE

80.5

Team DRtg

+1.3

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #67Honoka YasuiJPN

//current_rank

#68

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #69Avery ArijeCanada

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

11.4

PPG

8.0

RPG

1.7

APG

0.6

SPG

0.6

BPG

3P%

44%

TS%

event_stats