Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Avery Arije

CAN · b. 2009

//measurables

180 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

3.4 APGCreation · 95th event percentile

12.3 PPGScoring load · 92nd event percentile

64.4
HESI v2.1: #69
of 192: 74%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #69 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

64.4

Event performance

64th event percentile

66.0

Prospect index

64th event percentile

ORtg

92.9

Points / 100 poss.

67th event percentile

DRtg

84.8

Lower is better

46th event percentile

NRtg

+8.0

Two-way margin

61st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 92.9 · 67th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 84.8 · Stop% 55.4% · Team DRtg 82.1

Sample context

7 games · 169 minutes · 74% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

3.4 APG95th event percentile

Scoring load

12.3 PPG92nd event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

64.4

64th event percentile

Prospect index

66.0

64th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

92.9

67th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

84.8

46th event percentile

Two-way margin

+8.0

61st event percentile

Stop percentage

55.4%

47th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.3 PPG

92nd event percentile

Creation

3.4 APG

95th event percentile

Rebounding

4.7 RPG

76th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.1 stocks

58th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

43.5% TS

55th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P95
Creator
3.4 APG · 95th event percentile
P92
Scorer
12.3 PPG · 92nd event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 64th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 92.9 ORtg and 84.8 DRtg, producing a +8.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

Creation
3.4 APG
95th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
12.3 PPG
92nd event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
76th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

92.9

67th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.3 PPG

92nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

43.5%

55th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

35.7%

42nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

33.3%

49th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

18.2%

context

3.1 attempts per game

Free throws

76.5%

80th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

43.5%

71st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

3.4 APG

95th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

84.8

46th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

82.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-2.7

46th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

55.4%

47th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.1 STL+BLK

58th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

36.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+8.0

61st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+6.0

64th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

64.4

64th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

66.0

64th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

7.5%

83rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.7 RPG

76th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

168.9

context

24.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#69

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

540.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

12.3

PPG

4.7

RPG

3.4

APG

#69

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#69/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.3

PPG

4.7

RPG

3.4

APG

2.7

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

44%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.3

P92

Playmaking

3.4

P95

Rebounding

4.7

P76

True shooting

44%

P55

Two-way impact

+8.0

P61

Stops

55%

P47

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

33%

28 made / 84 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

4 made / 22 attempts

Free throws

77%

26 made / 34 attempts

Shot selection

26% of attempts from three

●2PA 62●3PA 22

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

12.3 / game

28–84

FGM–FGA

4–22

3PM–3PA

26–34

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

3.4 / game

TOV

2.7 / game

1.26×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

4.7 / game

OREB

DREB

4.7

REB/G

defense

STL

0.7 / game

BLK

0.4 / game

STL+BLK

1.1 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

64.4

HESI

66.0

92.9

ORtg

84.8

DRtg

+8.0

NRtg

+6.0

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

44%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

PIE

82.1

Team DRtg

-2.7

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #68Imani RasmussenNZL

//current_rank

#69

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #70Kohse HosozawaJPN

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

12.3

PPG

4.7

RPG

3.4

APG

0.7

SPG

0.4

BPG

18%

3P%

44%

TS%

event_stats