ORtg
83.6
50th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
JPN · b. 2009
//measurables
176 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
4.7 RPGRebounding · 76th event percentile
2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 75th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #70 of 192 · Established
HESI
63.9
Event performance
64th event percentile
PI
65.6
Prospect index
64th event percentile
ORtg
83.6
Points / 100 poss.
50th event percentile
DRtg
76.1
Lower is better
75th event percentile
NRtg
+7.5
Two-way margin
61st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 83.6 · 50th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 76.1 · Stop% 70.0% · Team DRtg 79.1
Sample context
7 games · 176 minutes · 75% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
63.9
64th event percentile
Prospect index
65.6
64th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
83.6
50th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
76.1
75th event percentile
Two-way margin
+7.5
61st event percentile
Stop percentage
70.0%
83rd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
7.4 PPG
72nd event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
45th event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
76th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
75th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
36.9% TS
36th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Activity
4.7 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 76th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 64th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 83.6 ORtg and 76.1 DRtg, producing a +7.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, rebounding, and defensive activity. The lowest relative area is scoring efficiency.
Defensive stops
70.0% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive activity
2.3 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Scoring efficiency
36.9% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
83.6
50th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
7.4 PPG
72nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
36.9%
36th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
33.3%
35th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
27.0%
29th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.2%
context5.1 attempts per game
Free throws
58.8%
50th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.7%
44th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
45th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
76.1
75th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
79.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.0
83rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.0%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
75th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
44.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+7.5
61st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+5.7
64th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
63.9
64th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
65.6
64th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.0%
67th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.7 RPG
76th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
176.2
context25.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#70
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
506.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
7.4
PPG
4.7
RPG
1.0
APG
#70
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
7.4
PPG
4.7
RPG
1.0
APG
0.7
TOV/G
1.1
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.4
P72
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
4.7
P76
True shooting
37%
P36
Two-way impact
+7.5
P61
Stops
70%
P83
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
27%
17 made / 63 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
8 made / 36 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
10 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
52
PTS
7.4 / game
17–63
FGM–FGA
8–36
3PM–3PA
10–17
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
1.40×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
33
REB
4.7 / game
9
OREB
24
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
13
STL
1.9 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
16
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
63.9
HESI
65.6
PI
83.6
ORtg
76.1
DRtg
+7.5
NRtg
+5.7
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
5%
PIE
79.1
Team DRtg
+3.0
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
//current_rank
#70
of 192 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
7.4
PPG
4.7
RPG
1.0
APG
1.9
SPG
0.4
BPG
22%
3P%
37%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #70
//quick_read
7.4
PPG
4.7
RPG
1.0
APG
0.7
TOV/G
1.1
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.4
P72
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
4.7
P76
True shooting
37%
P36
Two-way impact
+7.5
P61
Stops
70%
P83
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
27%
17 made / 63 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
8 made / 36 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
10 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
52
PTS
7.4 / game
17–63
FGM–FGA
8–36
3PM–3PA
10–17
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
1.40×
AST:TOV
18
FD
rebounding
33
REB
4.7 / game
9
OREB
24
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
13
STL
1.9 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
16
PF
16
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
63.9
HESI
65.6
PI
83.6
ORtg
76.1
DRtg
+7.5
NRtg
+5.7
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
5%
PIE
79.1
Team DRtg
+3.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.