ORtg
72.5
37th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Moescha Feunou Bakam
GER · b. 2009
//measurables
184 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalDefensive Impact62.9 DRtg · 82% Stop% · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
60.7% TSScoring efficiency · 97th event percentile
3.7 RPGRebounding · 65th event percentile
- 63.4
- HESI v2.1
- #71
- of 192
- 57%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #71 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
63.4
Event performance
63rd event percentile
PI
65.2
Prospect index
63rd event percentile
ORtg
72.5
Points / 100 poss.
37th event percentile
DRtg
62.9
Lower is better
95th event percentile
NRtg
+9.7
Two-way margin
66th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 72.5 · 37th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 62.9 · Stop% 82.1% · Team DRtg 69.5
Sample context
7 games · 81 minutes · 57% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
60.7% TS97th event percentile
Rebounding
3.7 RPG65th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
63.4
63rd event percentile
Prospect index
65.2
63rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
72.5
37th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
62.9
95th event percentile
Two-way margin
+9.7
66th event percentile
Stop percentage
82.1%
95th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.9 PPG
33rd event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
20th event percentile
Rebounding
3.7 RPG
65th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.1 stocks
58th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
60.7% TS
97th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P95
Defensive Impact
62.9 DRtg · 82% Stop% · 95th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 63rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 72.5 ORtg and 62.9 DRtg, producing a +9.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, defensive stops, and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 97th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
60.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 95th event percentile
Defensive stops
82.1% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 95th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
62.9 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 20th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 33rd event percentile
Scoring load
2.9 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 37th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
72.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.9 PPG
33rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
60.7%
97th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
55.6%
95th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
55.6%
97th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
58.8%
50th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.8%
50th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.4 APG
20th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
62.9
95th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
69.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+6.6
92nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
82.1%
95th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.1 STL+BLK
58th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+9.7
66th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+5.7
63rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
63.4
63rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
65.2
63rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.5%
35th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.7 RPG
65th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
81.1
context11.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
57.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#71
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
575.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
2.9
PPG
3.7
RPG
0.4
APG
#71
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#71/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.9
PPG
3.7
RPG
0.4
APG
1.9
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.9
P33
Playmaking
0.4
P20
Rebounding
3.7
P65
True shooting
61%
P97
Two-way impact
+9.7
P66
Stops
82%
P95
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
56%
5 made / 9 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
10 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 9●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
2.9 / game
5–9
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
10–17
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.4 / game
13
TOV
1.9 / game
0.23×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
26
REB
3.7 / game
7
OREB
19
DREB
3.7
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.7 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
17
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
63.4
HESI
65.2
PI
72.5
ORtg
62.9
DRtg
+9.7
NRtg
+5.7
Stable NRtg
82%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
56%
eFG%
2%
PIE
69.5
Team DRtg
+6.6
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#69
#70
#72
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
2.9
PPG
3.7
RPG
0.4
APG
0.7
SPG
0.4
BPG
—
3P%
61%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #71
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.9
PPG
3.7
RPG
0.4
APG
1.9
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.9
P33
Playmaking
0.4
P20
Rebounding
3.7
P65
True shooting
61%
P97
Two-way impact
+9.7
P66
Stops
82%
P95
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
56%
5 made / 9 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
59%
10 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 9●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
20
PTS
2.9 / game
5–9
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
10–17
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.4 / game
13
TOV
1.9 / game
0.23×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
26
REB
3.7 / game
7
OREB
19
DREB
3.7
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.7 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
17
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
63.4
HESI
65.2
PI
72.5
ORtg
62.9
DRtg
+9.7
NRtg
+5.7
Stable NRtg
82%
Stop%
38%
Floor%
56%
eFG%
2%
PIE
69.5
Team DRtg
+6.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.