ORtg
25.7
13th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
BEN · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.0 APGCreation · 78th event percentile
4.5 RPGRebounding · 66th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #142 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
0.0
Event performance
1st event percentile
PI
11.5
Prospect index
1st event percentile
ORtg
25.7
Points / 100 poss.
13th event percentile
DRtg
80.9
Lower is better
9th event percentile
NRtg
-55.2
Two-way margin
10th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 25.7 · 13th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 80.9 · Stop% 59.4% · Team DRtg 80.2
Sample context
4 games · 113 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Rebounding
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
0.0
1st event percentile
Prospect index
11.5
1st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
25.7
13th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.9
9th event percentile
Two-way margin
-55.2
10th event percentile
Stop percentage
59.4%
29th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
4.8 PPG
60th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
78th event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
66th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.5 stocks
51st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
17.6% TS
13th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 1st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 25.7 ORtg and 80.9 DRtg, producing a -55.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Creation
2.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive efficiency
80.9 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-55.2 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
25.7 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
25.7
13th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
4.8 PPG
60th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
17.6%
13th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
14.9%
12th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
14.9%
15th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context2.5 attempts per game
Free throws
31.3%
22nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
13.9%
14th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
78th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
80.9
9th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.8
56th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
59.4%
29th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.5 STL+BLK
51st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
34.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-55.2
10th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-39.0
1st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
0.0
1st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
11.5
1st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-23.9%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
66th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
113.3
context28.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#142
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
406.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
4.8
PPG
4.5
RPG
2.0
APG
#142
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#20
RANK
20
FIELD
0%
PERCENTILE
5.5
PPG
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
4.8
PPG
4.5
RPG
2.0
APG
9.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
18%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.8
P60
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
4.5
P66
True shooting
18%
P13
Two-way impact
-55.2
P10
Stops
59%
P29
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
15%
7 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
31%
5 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
21% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
19
PTS
4.8 / game
7–47
FGM–FGA
0–10
3PM–3PA
5–16
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
2.0 / game
39
TOV
9.8 / game
0.21×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
18
REB
4.5 / game
4
OREB
14
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
11
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
0.0
HESI
11.5
PI
25.7
ORtg
80.9
DRtg
-55.2
NRtg
-39.0
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
14%
Floor%
15%
eFG%
-24%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
-0.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
//quick_read
5.5
PPG
8.0
RPG
0.0
APG
8.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
17%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.5
P57
Playmaking
0.0
P20
Rebounding
8.0
P85
True shooting
17%
P22
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
12%
3 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
28%
5 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
4% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
5.5 / game
3–25
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
5–18
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
17
TOV
8.5 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
16
REB
8.0 / game
5
OREB
11
DREB
8.0
REB/G
defense
12
STL
6.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
12
STL+BLK
6.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
12%
eFG%
0%
PIE
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#142
of 142 ranked
//end_of_the_board
No one ranks below this player in the event.
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
2
GP
5.5
PPG
8.0
RPG
0.0
APG
6.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
17%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #142
//quick_read
4.8
PPG
4.5
RPG
2.0
APG
9.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
18%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.8
P60
Playmaking
2.0
P78
Rebounding
4.5
P66
True shooting
18%
P13
Two-way impact
-55.2
P10
Stops
59%
P29
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
15%
7 made / 47 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
31%
5 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
21% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
19
PTS
4.8 / game
7–47
FGM–FGA
0–10
3PM–3PA
5–16
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
2.0 / game
39
TOV
9.8 / game
0.21×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
18
REB
4.5 / game
4
OREB
14
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
11
PF
10
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
0.0
HESI
11.5
PI
25.7
ORtg
80.9
DRtg
-55.2
NRtg
-39.0
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
14%
Floor%
15%
eFG%
-24%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
-0.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 32026
2 GP · event rank #20
//quick_read
5.5
PPG
8.0
RPG
0.0
APG
8.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
17%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.5
P57
Playmaking
0.0
P20
Rebounding
8.0
P85
True shooting
17%
P22
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
12%
3 made / 25 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
28%
5 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
4% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
11
PTS
5.5 / game
3–25
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
5–18
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
17
TOV
8.5 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
16
REB
8.0 / game
5
OREB
11
DREB
8.0
REB/G
defense
12
STL
6.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
12
STL+BLK
6.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
12%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.