ORtg
88.4
92nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Hania Hassabelnaby
EGY · b. 2009
//measurables
184 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profileFilm and human evaluation lead this profile.
9 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalCreator4.2 APG · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalScorer13.2 PPG · 95th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency47% TS on 13.2 PPG · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact88.4 ORtg · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
- 9
- film items
- 0
- scout badges
- On file
- scout report
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Highlight reelHighlight · Instagram · event import
HighlightIG ↗
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelHighlight · YouTube · approved scout evidence · opens externally
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelHighlight · YouTube · approved scout evidence · opens externally
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelHighlight · YouTube · approved scout evidence · opens externally
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelHighlight · YouTube · approved scout evidence · opens externally
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelHighlight · YouTube · approved scout evidence · opens externally
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelHighlight · YouTube · approved scout evidence · opens externally
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelHighlight · YouTube · approved scout evidence · opens externally
- Highlightscout: Fahd WaelHighlight · YouTube · approved scout evidence · opens externally
02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
2026-09-01
Live viewing13 games watchedHigh confidence
Scouting context is for signed-in users.
Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.
[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #13 of 142 · Established
HESI
90.8
Event performance
90th event percentile
PI
85.3
Prospect index
91st event percentile
ORtg
88.4
Points / 100 poss.
92nd event percentile
DRtg
59.3
Lower is better
66th event percentile
NRtg
+29.1
Two-way margin
84th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 88.4 · 92nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 59.3 · Stop% 65.8% · Team DRtg 56.7
Sample context
6 games · 170 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
4.2 APG96th event percentile
Scoring load
13.2 PPG95th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
90.8
90th event percentile
Prospect index
85.3
91st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
88.4
92nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.3
66th event percentile
Two-way margin
+29.1
84th event percentile
Stop percentage
65.8%
49th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
13.2 PPG
95th event percentile
Creation
4.2 APG
96th event percentile
Rebounding
5.7 RPG
76th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
62nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.4% TS
93rd event percentile
//rated_event_history
Every rated competition
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P96
Creator
4.2 APG · 96th event percentile
- P95
Scorer
13.2 PPG · 95th event percentile
- P93
Event Efficiency
47% TS on 13.2 PPG · 93rd event percentile
- P92
Offensive Impact
88.4 ORtg · 92nd event percentile
- P87
Event Impact
90.8 HESI performance · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 90th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 88.4 ORtg and 59.3 DRtg, producing a +29.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 96th event percentile
Creation
4.2 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 95th event percentile
Scoring load
13.2 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 93rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.4% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
13.2 PPG
95th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
47.4%
93rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
47.1%
96th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
44.1%
96th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.2%
context3.0 attempts per game
Free throws
42.9%
33rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
43.8%
92nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
4.2 APG
96th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
59.3
66th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.6
40th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
65.8%
49th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
62nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
50.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+29.1
84th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+19.3
90th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
90.8
90th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
85.3
91st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
15.0%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.7 RPG
76th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
170.2
context28.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
73.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#13
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
538.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
11.3
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.7
APG
#108
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#1
RANK
48
FIELD
100%
PERCENTILE
12.3
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#108/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.3
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.7
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.3
P88
Playmaking
0.7
P34
Rebounding
3.9
P67
True shooting
43%
P51
Two-way impact
-1.7
P45
Stops
55%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
31 made / 79 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
3 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
45%
14 made / 31 attempts
Shot selection
27% of attempts from three
●2PA 58●3PA 21
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
79
PTS
11.3 / game
31–79
FGM–FGA
3–21
3PM–3PA
14–31
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.7 / game
12
TOV
1.7 / game
0.42×
AST:TOV
24
FD
rebounding
27
REB
3.9 / game
12
OREB
15
DREB
3.9
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.3 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
10
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
44.5
HESI
50.1
PI
82.8
ORtg
84.5
DRtg
-1.7
NRtg
-1.2
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
5%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
-3.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#13/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
13.2
PPG
5.7
RPG
4.2
APG
3.2
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
13.2
P95
Playmaking
4.2
P96
Rebounding
5.7
P76
True shooting
47%
P93
Two-way impact
+29.1
P84
Stops
66%
P49
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
30 made / 68 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
4 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
15 made / 35 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 50●3PA 18
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
79
PTS
13.2 / game
30–68
FGM–FGA
4–18
3PM–3PA
15–35
FTM–FTA
creation
25
AST
4.2 / game
19
TOV
3.2 / game
1.32×
AST:TOV
24
FD
rebounding
34
REB
5.7 / game
9
OREB
25
DREB
5.7
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
13
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
90.8
HESI
85.3
PI
88.4
ORtg
59.3
DRtg
+29.1
NRtg
+19.3
Stable NRtg
66%
Stop%
44%
Floor%
47%
eFG%
15%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-2.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#1/48view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.3
PPG
6.3
RPG
3.3
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.3
P89
Playmaking
3.3
P89
Rebounding
6.3
P80
True shooting
55%
P90
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
56%
15 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
1 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
6 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 20●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
12.3 / game
15–27
FGM–FGA
1–7
3PM–3PA
6–15
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
3.3 / game
6
TOV
2.0 / game
1.67×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
19
REB
6.3 / game
9
OREB
10
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
2.3 / game
2
BLK
0.7 / game
3
PF
9
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
57%
eFG%
5%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #107Shamar BroughtonNZLrank_below · #109Sandra DavilaSpain
//current_rank
#108
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#106
#107
#109
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
12.3
PPG
6.3
RPG
3.3
APG
2.3
SPG
0.7
BPG
—
3P%
55%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #108
//quick_read
The line at a glance
11.3
PPG
3.9
RPG
0.7
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
11.3
P88
Playmaking
0.7
P34
Rebounding
3.9
P67
True shooting
43%
P51
Two-way impact
-1.7
P45
Stops
55%
P45
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
39%
31 made / 79 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
3 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
45%
14 made / 31 attempts
Shot selection
27% of attempts from three
●2PA 58●3PA 21
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
79
PTS
11.3 / game
31–79
FGM–FGA
3–21
3PM–3PA
14–31
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.7 / game
12
TOV
1.7 / game
0.42×
AST:TOV
24
FD
rebounding
27
REB
3.9 / game
12
OREB
15
DREB
3.9
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.3 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
10
PF
10
STL+BLK
1.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
44.5
HESI
50.1
PI
82.8
ORtg
84.5
DRtg
-1.7
NRtg
-1.2
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
5%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
-3.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #13
//quick_read
The line at a glance
13.2
PPG
5.7
RPG
4.2
APG
3.2
TOV/G
0.7
3PM/G
47%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
13.2
P95
Playmaking
4.2
P96
Rebounding
5.7
P76
True shooting
47%
P93
Two-way impact
+29.1
P84
Stops
66%
P49
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
30 made / 68 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
4 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
15 made / 35 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 50●3PA 18
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
79
PTS
13.2 / game
30–68
FGM–FGA
4–18
3PM–3PA
15–35
FTM–FTA
creation
25
AST
4.2 / game
19
TOV
3.2 / game
1.32×
AST:TOV
24
FD
rebounding
34
REB
5.7 / game
9
OREB
25
DREB
5.7
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
13
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
90.8
HESI
85.3
PI
88.4
ORtg
59.3
DRtg
+29.1
NRtg
+19.3
Stable NRtg
66%
Stop%
44%
Floor%
47%
eFG%
15%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-2.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
3 GP · event rank #1
//quick_read
The line at a glance
12.3
PPG
6.3
RPG
3.3
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
55%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
12.3
P89
Playmaking
3.3
P89
Rebounding
6.3
P80
True shooting
55%
P90
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
56%
15 made / 27 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
14%
1 made / 7 attempts
FT
Free throws
40%
6 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
26% of attempts from three
●2PA 20●3PA 7
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
37
PTS
12.3 / game
15–27
FGM–FGA
1–7
3PM–3PA
6–15
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
3.3 / game
6
TOV
2.0 / game
1.67×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
19
REB
6.3 / game
9
OREB
10
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
2.3 / game
2
BLK
0.7 / game
3
PF
9
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
57%
eFG%
5%
PIE
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.