back_to_rankings
Hania Hassabelnaby portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Hania Hassabelnaby

EGY · b. 2009

//measurables

184 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

9 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalScorer11.3 PPG · 88th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
9
film items
0
scout badges
On file
scout report

01

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

02

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Ahmed Tareq

2026-09-01

Live viewing13 games watchedHigh confidence

Scouting context is for signed-in users.

Create a free account to unlock the scout's note, style comparisons, and evaluation for this athlete.

[ UNLOCK_FREE → ]

03

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #108 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

44.5

Event performance

45th event percentile

PI

50.1

Prospect index

44th event percentile

ORtg

82.8

Points / 100 poss.

47th event percentile

DRtg

84.5

Lower is better

47th event percentile

NRtg

-1.7

Two-way margin

45th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 82.8 · 47th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 84.5 · Stop% 54.9% · Team DRtg 81.3

Sample context

7 games · 166 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

11.3 PPG88th event percentile

Rebounding

3.9 RPG67th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  2. 02

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

44.5

45th event percentile

Prospect index

50.1

44th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

82.8

47th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

84.5

47th event percentile

Two-way margin

-1.7

45th event percentile

Stop percentage

54.9%

45th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

11.3 PPG

88th event percentile

Creation

0.7 APG

34th event percentile

Rebounding

3.9 RPG

67th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.4 stocks

60th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

42.6% TS

51st event percentile

//rated_event_history

Every rated competition

Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P88

    Scorer

    11.3 PPG · 88th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 45th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 82.8 ORtg and 84.5 DRtg, producing a -1.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load and rebounding. The lowest relative area is creation.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring load

    11.3 PPG

    88th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  2. Rebounding

    3.9 RPG

    67th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.7 APG

    34th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

82.8

47th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

11.3 PPG

88th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

42.6%

51st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

41.1%

62nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

39.2%

72nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

14.3%

context

3.0 attempts per game

Free throws

45.2%

27th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

41.7%

63rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.7 APG

34th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

84.5

47th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

81.3

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.2

39th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

54.9%

45th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.4 STL+BLK

60th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

35.9

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-1.7

45th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-1.2

45th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

44.5

45th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

50.1

44th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

4.9%

67th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.9 RPG

67th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

166.2

context

23.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#108

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

550.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

04

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

11.3

PPG

3.9

RPG

0.7

APG

#108

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#1

RANK

48

FIELD

100%

PERCENTILE

12.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#108/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.3

PPG

3.9

RPG

0.7

APG

1.7

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.3

P88

Playmaking

0.7

P34

Rebounding

3.9

P67

True shooting

43%

P51

Two-way impact

-1.7

P45

Stops

55%

P45

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

31 made / 79 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

3 made / 21 attempts

FT

Free throws

45%

14 made / 31 attempts

Shot selection

27% of attempts from three

2PA 583PA 21

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

79

PTS

11.3 / game

31–79

FGM–FGA

3–21

3PM–3PA

14–31

FTM–FTA

creation

5

AST

0.7 / game

12

TOV

1.7 / game

0.42×

AST:TOV

24

FD

rebounding

27

REB

3.9 / game

12

OREB

15

DREB

3.9

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.3 / game

1

BLK

0.1 / game

10

PF

10

STL+BLK

1.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

44.5

HESI

50.1

PI

82.8

ORtg

84.5

DRtg

-1.7

NRtg

-1.2

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

42%

Floor%

41%

eFG%

5%

PIE

81.3

Team DRtg

-3.2

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games166 minutes23.7 min/game73% sample weightrank #108 of 192

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#13/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

13.2

PPG

5.7

RPG

4.2

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

47%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

13.2

P95

Playmaking

4.2

P96

Rebounding

5.7

P76

True shooting

47%

P93

Two-way impact

+29.1

P84

Stops

66%

P49

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

44%

30 made / 68 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

22%

4 made / 18 attempts

FT

Free throws

43%

15 made / 35 attempts

Shot selection

26% of attempts from three

2PA 503PA 18

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

79

PTS

13.2 / game

30–68

FGM–FGA

4–18

3PM–3PA

15–35

FTM–FTA

creation

25

AST

4.2 / game

19

TOV

3.2 / game

1.32×

AST:TOV

24

FD

rebounding

34

REB

5.7 / game

9

OREB

25

DREB

5.7

REB/G

defense

13

STL

2.2 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

13

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

90.8

HESI

85.3

PI

88.4

ORtg

59.3

DRtg

+29.1

NRtg

+19.3

Stable NRtg

66%

Stop%

44%

Floor%

47%

eFG%

15%

PIE

56.7

Team DRtg

-2.6

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games170 minutes28.4 min/game74% sample weightrank #13 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.3

PPG

6.3

RPG

3.3

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

55%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.3

P89

Playmaking

3.3

P89

Rebounding

6.3

P80

True shooting

55%

P90

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

56%

15 made / 27 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

40%

6 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

26% of attempts from three

2PA 203PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

37

PTS

12.3 / game

15–27

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

6–15

FTM–FTA

creation

10

AST

3.3 / game

6

TOV

2.0 / game

1.67×

AST:TOV

FD

rebounding

19

REB

6.3 / game

9

OREB

10

DREB

6.3

REB/G

defense

7

STL

2.3 / game

2

BLK

0.7 / game

3

PF

9

STL+BLK

3.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

57%

eFG%

5%

PIE

sample_context

3 gamesrank #1 of 48
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Hanyun Sun portrait#106

    Hanyun Sun

    CHN

    15.0 PPG 6.7 RPG 3.0 APG

  • Shamar Broughton portrait#107

    Shamar Broughton

    NZL

    7.9 PPG 2.9 RPG 3.1 APG

  • Sandra Davila portrait#109

    Sandra Davila

    Spain

    4.0 PPG 5.0 RPG 1.0 APG

05

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3

GP

12.3

PPG

6.3

RPG

3.3

APG

2.3

SPG

0.7

BPG

3P%

55%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #108

//quick_read

The line at a glance

11.3

PPG

3.9

RPG

0.7

APG

1.7

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

11.3

P88

Playmaking

0.7

P34

Rebounding

3.9

P67

True shooting

43%

P51

Two-way impact

-1.7

P45

Stops

55%

P45

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

39%

31 made / 79 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

3 made / 21 attempts

FT

Free throws

45%

14 made / 31 attempts

Shot selection

27% of attempts from three

2PA 583PA 21

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

79

PTS

11.3 / game

31–79

FGM–FGA

3–21

3PM–3PA

14–31

FTM–FTA

creation

5

AST

0.7 / game

12

TOV

1.7 / game

0.42×

AST:TOV

24

FD

rebounding

27

REB

3.9 / game

12

OREB

15

DREB

3.9

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.3 / game

1

BLK

0.1 / game

10

PF

10

STL+BLK

1.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

44.5

HESI

50.1

PI

82.8

ORtg

84.5

DRtg

-1.7

NRtg

-1.2

Stable NRtg

55%

Stop%

42%

Floor%

41%

eFG%

5%

PIE

81.3

Team DRtg

-3.2

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games166 minutes23.7 min/game73% sample weightrank #108 of 192

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #13

//quick_read

The line at a glance

13.2

PPG

5.7

RPG

4.2

APG

3.2

TOV/G

0.7

3PM/G

47%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

13.2

P95

Playmaking

4.2

P96

Rebounding

5.7

P76

True shooting

47%

P93

Two-way impact

+29.1

P84

Stops

66%

P49

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

44%

30 made / 68 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

22%

4 made / 18 attempts

FT

Free throws

43%

15 made / 35 attempts

Shot selection

26% of attempts from three

2PA 503PA 18

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

79

PTS

13.2 / game

30–68

FGM–FGA

4–18

3PM–3PA

15–35

FTM–FTA

creation

25

AST

4.2 / game

19

TOV

3.2 / game

1.32×

AST:TOV

24

FD

rebounding

34

REB

5.7 / game

9

OREB

25

DREB

5.7

REB/G

defense

13

STL

2.2 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

13

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

90.8

HESI

85.3

PI

88.4

ORtg

59.3

DRtg

+29.1

NRtg

+19.3

Stable NRtg

66%

Stop%

44%

Floor%

47%

eFG%

15%

PIE

56.7

Team DRtg

-2.6

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games170 minutes28.4 min/game74% sample weightrank #13 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026

3 GP · event rank #1

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.3

PPG

6.3

RPG

3.3

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

55%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.3

P89

Playmaking

3.3

P89

Rebounding

6.3

P80

True shooting

55%

P90

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

56%

15 made / 27 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

40%

6 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

26% of attempts from three

2PA 203PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

37

PTS

12.3 / game

15–27

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

6–15

FTM–FTA

creation

10

AST

3.3 / game

6

TOV

2.0 / game

1.67×

AST:TOV

FD

rebounding

19

REB

6.3 / game

9

OREB

10

DREB

6.3

REB/G

defense

7

STL

2.3 / game

2

BLK

0.7 / game

3

PF

9

STL+BLK

3.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

57%

eFG%

5%

PIE

sample_context

3 gamesrank #1 of 48

06

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.