ORtg
68.2
62nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
CIV · b. 2008
//measurables
194 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
7.8 RPGRebounding · 90th event percentile
2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 72nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #23 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
85.8
Event performance
86th event percentile
PI
80.2
Prospect index
84th event percentile
ORtg
68.2
Points / 100 poss.
62nd event percentile
DRtg
30.5
Lower is better
99th event percentile
NRtg
+37.7
Two-way margin
93rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 68.2 · 62nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 30.5 · Stop% 1.1% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
6 games · 76 minutes · 56% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
85.8
86th event percentile
Prospect index
80.2
84th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
68.2
62nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
30.5
99th event percentile
Two-way margin
+37.7
93rd event percentile
Stop percentage
107.1%
99th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
3.8 PPG
53rd event percentile
Creation
0.5 APG
31st event percentile
Rebounding
7.8 RPG
90th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
72nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
26.9% TS
34th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Defensive Impact
30.5 DRtg · 107% Stop% · 99th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 91st event percentile
Rebounder
7.8 RPG · 90th event percentile
Event Impact
85.8 HESI performance · 89th event percentile
Activity
7.8 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 78th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 86th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 68.2 ORtg and 30.5 DRtg, producing a +37.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are creation and scoring efficiency.
Defensive efficiency
30.5 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive stops
1.1% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Two-way margin
+37.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Creation
0.5 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Scoring efficiency
26.9% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
68.2
62nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
3.8 PPG
53rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
26.9%
34th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
18.2%
20th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
18.2%
23rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.6%
75th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.5 APG
31st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
30.5
99th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+11.2
97th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
1.1%
99th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
72nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
37.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+37.7
93rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+17.4
86th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
85.8
86th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
80.2
84th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
13.0%
71st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.8 RPG
90th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
76.4
context12.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
56.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#23
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
3.8
PPG
7.8
RPG
0.5
APG
#23
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
3.8
PPG
7.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
3.8
P53
Playmaking
0.5
P31
Rebounding
7.8
P90
True shooting
27%
P34
Two-way impact
+37.7
P93
Stops
1%
P99
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
18%
6 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
11 made / 22 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
23
PTS
3.8 / game
6–33
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
11–22
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.5 / game
8
TOV
1.3 / game
0.38×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
47
REB
7.8 / game
21
OREB
26
DREB
7.8
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
12
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
85.8
HESI
80.2
PI
68.2
ORtg
30.5
DRtg
+37.7
NRtg
+17.4
Stable NRtg
1%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
18%
eFG%
13%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+11.2
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#23
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
3.8
PPG
7.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.3
SPG
1.0
BPG
—
3P%
27%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #23
//quick_read
3.8
PPG
7.8
RPG
0.5
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
27%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
3.8
P53
Playmaking
0.5
P31
Rebounding
7.8
P90
True shooting
27%
P34
Two-way impact
+37.7
P93
Stops
1%
P99
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
18%
6 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
11 made / 22 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
23
PTS
3.8 / game
6–33
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
11–22
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.5 / game
8
TOV
1.3 / game
0.38×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
47
REB
7.8 / game
21
OREB
26
DREB
7.8
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.3 / game
6
BLK
1.0 / game
12
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
85.8
HESI
80.2
PI
68.2
ORtg
30.5
DRtg
+37.7
NRtg
+17.4
Stable NRtg
1%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
18%
eFG%
13%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+11.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.