back_to_rankings
Fanta Diarra portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Fanta Diarra

CIV · b. 2008

//measurables

194 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalDefensive Impact30.5 DRtg · 107% Stop% · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder7.8 RPG · 90th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Impact85.8 HESI performance · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

7.8 RPGRebounding · 90th event percentile

2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 72nd event percentile

85.8
HESI v2.1
#23
of 142
56%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #23 of 142 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

85.8

Event performance

86th event percentile

PI

80.2

Prospect index

84th event percentile

ORtg

68.2

Points / 100 poss.

62nd event percentile

DRtg

30.5

Lower is better

99th event percentile

NRtg

+37.7

Two-way margin

93rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 68.2 · 62nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 30.5 · Stop% 1.1% · Team DRtg 41.7

Sample context

6 games · 76 minutes · 56% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

7.8 RPG90th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks72nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

85.8

86th event percentile

Prospect index

80.2

84th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

68.2

62nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

30.5

99th event percentile

Two-way margin

+37.7

93rd event percentile

Stop percentage

107.1%

99th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.8 PPG

53rd event percentile

Creation

0.5 APG

31st event percentile

Rebounding

7.8 RPG

90th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.3 stocks

72nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

26.9% TS

34th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P99

    Defensive Impact

    30.5 DRtg · 107% Stop% · 99th event percentile

  • P91

    Rim Protection

    1.0 BPG · 91st event percentile

  • P90

    Rebounder

    7.8 RPG · 90th event percentile

  • P89

    Event Impact

    85.8 HESI performance · 89th event percentile

  • P78

    Activity

    7.8 RPG + 2.3 defensive plays/G · 78th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 86th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 68.2 ORtg and 30.5 DRtg, producing a +37.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are creation and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive efficiency

    30.5 DRtg

    99th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  2. Defensive stops

    1.1% Stop%

    99th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

  3. Two-way margin

    +37.7 NRtg

    93rd event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.5 APG

    31st event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    26.9% TS

    34th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

68.2

62nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.8 PPG

53rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

26.9%

34th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

18.2%

20th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

18.2%

23rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Free throws

50.0%

53rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

36.6%

75th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.5 APG

31st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

30.5

99th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

41.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+11.2

97th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

1.1%

99th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.3 STL+BLK

72nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

37.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+37.7

93rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+17.4

86th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

85.8

86th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

80.2

84th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

13.0%

71st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.8 RPG

90th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

76.4

context

12.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

56.0%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#23

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

542.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

3.8

PPG

7.8

RPG

0.5

APG

#23

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#23/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.8

PPG

7.8

RPG

0.5

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

27%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.8

P53

Playmaking

0.5

P31

Rebounding

7.8

P90

True shooting

27%

P34

Two-way impact

+37.7

P93

Stops

1%

P99

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

18%

6 made / 33 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

11 made / 22 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

2PA 333PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

3.8 / game

6–33

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

11–22

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.5 / game

8

TOV

1.3 / game

0.38×

AST:TOV

15

FD

rebounding

47

REB

7.8 / game

21

OREB

26

DREB

7.8

REB/G

defense

8

STL

1.3 / game

6

BLK

1.0 / game

12

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

85.8

HESI

80.2

PI

68.2

ORtg

30.5

DRtg

+37.7

NRtg

+17.4

Stable NRtg

1%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

18%

eFG%

13%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

+11.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games76 minutes12.7 min/game56% sample weightrank #23 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Maëlys, Shana, Zoé ROUA portrait#21

    Maëlys, Shana, Zoé ROUA

    Small Forward · Côte d'Ivoire

    5.0 PPG 2.0 RPG 2.2 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.7 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Mariam Elshenawy portrait#22

    Mariam Elshenawy

    Egypt

    5.0 PPG 3.8 RPG 1.5 APG

  • Sedra Elshafey portrait#24

    Sedra Elshafey

    Egypt

    5.7 PPG 4.8 RPG 0.8 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

3.8

PPG

7.8

RPG

0.5

APG

1.3

SPG

1.0

BPG

3P%

27%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #23

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.8

PPG

7.8

RPG

0.5

APG

1.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

27%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.8

P53

Playmaking

0.5

P31

Rebounding

7.8

P90

True shooting

27%

P34

Two-way impact

+37.7

P93

Stops

1%

P99

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

18%

6 made / 33 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

11 made / 22 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

2PA 333PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

3.8 / game

6–33

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

11–22

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.5 / game

8

TOV

1.3 / game

0.38×

AST:TOV

15

FD

rebounding

47

REB

7.8 / game

21

OREB

26

DREB

7.8

REB/G

defense

8

STL

1.3 / game

6

BLK

1.0 / game

12

PF

14

STL+BLK

2.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

85.8

HESI

80.2

PI

68.2

ORtg

30.5

DRtg

+37.7

NRtg

+17.4

Stable NRtg

1%

Stop%

37%

Floor%

18%

eFG%

13%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

+11.2

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games76 minutes12.7 min/game56% sample weightrank #23 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.