back_to_rankings
Maelhys N'dri portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Maelhys N'dri

CIV · b. 2009

//measurables

178 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

42.7% TSScoring efficiency · 80th event percentile

2.8 stocksDefensive activity · 78th event percentile

80.8
HESI v2.1
#27
of 142
67%
sample weight

Performance

2 rated events

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #27 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

80.8

Event performance

81st event percentile

PI

77.4

Prospect index

81st event percentile

ORtg

66.1

Points / 100 poss.

60th event percentile

DRtg

46.2

Lower is better

88th event percentile

NRtg

+19.9

Two-way margin

76th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 66.1 · 60th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 46.2 · Stop% 67.5% · Team DRtg 41.7

Sample context

6 games · 119 minutes · 67% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

42.7% TS80th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.8 stocks78th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

80.8

81st event percentile

Prospect index

77.4

81st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

66.1

60th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

46.2

88th event percentile

Two-way margin

+19.9

76th event percentile

Stop percentage

67.5%

58th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.7 PPG

49th event percentile

Creation

1.5 APG

68th event percentile

Rebounding

3.2 RPG

48th event percentile

Defensive activity

2.8 stocks

78th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

42.7% TS

80th event percentile

//rated_event_history

Every rated competition

Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 81st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 66.1 ORtg and 46.2 DRtg, producing a +19.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and defensive activity.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive efficiency

    46.2 DRtg

    88th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    42.7% TS

    80th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

  3. Defensive activity

    2.8 steals + blocks/G

    78th event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

66.1

60th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.7 PPG

49th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

42.7%

80th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

41.7%

88th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

37.5%

85th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

28.6%

context

1.2 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

53rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

30.9%

59th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.5 APG

68th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

46.2

88th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

41.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.5

26th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

67.5%

58th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

2.8 STL+BLK

78th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

36.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+19.9

76th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+10.4

81st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

80.8

81st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

77.4

81st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

18.4%

80th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.2 RPG

48th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

119.4

context

19.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

66.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#27

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

542.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

3.3

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.3

APG

#192

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#27

RANK

142

FIELD

82%

PERCENTILE

3.7

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#192/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

30%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P38

Playmaking

1.3

P53

Rebounding

3.6

P62

True shooting

30%

P22

Two-way impact

-60.4

P5

Stops

43%

P7

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

11 made / 37 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 1 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

1 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

3% of attempts from three

2PA 363PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

3.3 / game

11–37

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

1–3

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.3 / game

23

TOV

3.3 / game

0.39×

AST:TOV

3

FD

rebounding

25

REB

3.6 / game

13

OREB

12

DREB

3.6

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.0 / game

4

BLK

0.6 / game

8

PF

11

STL+BLK

1.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

1.1

HESI

15.3

PI

45.3

ORtg

105.7

DRtg

-60.4

NRtg

-44.3

Stable NRtg

43%

Stop%

23%

Floor%

30%

eFG%

0%

PIE

101.1

Team DRtg

-4.6

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games166 minutes23.7 min/game73% sample weightrank #192 of 192

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#27/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.7

PPG

3.2

RPG

1.5

APG

2.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.7

P49

Playmaking

1.5

P68

Rebounding

3.2

P48

True shooting

43%

P80

Two-way impact

+19.9

P76

Stops

68%

P58

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

9 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

29%

2 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

2 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

2PA 173PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

22

PTS

3.7 / game

9–24

FGM–FGA

2–7

3PM–3PA

2–4

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.5 / game

16

TOV

2.7 / game

0.56×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.2 / game

11

OREB

8

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.3 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

5

PF

17

STL+BLK

2.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

80.8

HESI

77.4

PI

66.1

ORtg

46.2

DRtg

+19.9

NRtg

+10.4

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

31%

Floor%

42%

eFG%

18%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

-4.5

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games119 minutes19.9 min/game67% sample weightrank #27 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #191Salimata KoneCôte d'Ivoire

//current_rank

#192

of 192 ranked

//end_of_the_board

No one ranks below this player in the event.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Amelia Alonso portrait#2

    Amelia Alonso

    Spain

    12.4 PPG 7.0 RPG 1.9 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Ivanna Wilson Manyacka portrait#3

    Ivanna Wilson Manyacka

    United States

    12.9 PPG 6.0 RPG 1.7 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTop 3#3 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Meredith Jaime portrait#190

    Meredith Jaime

    MEX

    0.8 PPG 1.2 RPG 0.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

3.7

PPG

3.2

RPG

1.5

APG

2.3

SPG

0.5

BPG

29%

3P%

43%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #192

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

30%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P38

Playmaking

1.3

P53

Rebounding

3.6

P62

True shooting

30%

P22

Two-way impact

-60.4

P5

Stops

43%

P7

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

11 made / 37 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 1 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

1 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

3% of attempts from three

2PA 363PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

3.3 / game

11–37

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

1–3

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.3 / game

23

TOV

3.3 / game

0.39×

AST:TOV

3

FD

rebounding

25

REB

3.6 / game

13

OREB

12

DREB

3.6

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.0 / game

4

BLK

0.6 / game

8

PF

11

STL+BLK

1.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

1.1

HESI

15.3

PI

45.3

ORtg

105.7

DRtg

-60.4

NRtg

-44.3

Stable NRtg

43%

Stop%

23%

Floor%

30%

eFG%

0%

PIE

101.1

Team DRtg

-4.6

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games166 minutes23.7 min/game73% sample weightrank #192 of 192

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #27

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.7

PPG

3.2

RPG

1.5

APG

2.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.7

P49

Playmaking

1.5

P68

Rebounding

3.2

P48

True shooting

43%

P80

Two-way impact

+19.9

P76

Stops

68%

P58

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

9 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

29%

2 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

2 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

2PA 173PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

22

PTS

3.7 / game

9–24

FGM–FGA

2–7

3PM–3PA

2–4

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.5 / game

16

TOV

2.7 / game

0.56×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.2 / game

11

OREB

8

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.3 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

5

PF

17

STL+BLK

2.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

80.8

HESI

77.4

PI

66.1

ORtg

46.2

DRtg

+19.9

NRtg

+10.4

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

31%

Floor%

42%

eFG%

18%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

-4.5

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games119 minutes19.9 min/game67% sample weightrank #27 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.