back_to_rankings
Maelhys N'dri portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Maelhys N'dri

CIV · b. 2009

//measurables

178 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.6 stocksDefensive activity · 70th event percentile

3.6 RPGRebounding · 62nd event percentile

1.1
HESI v2.1
#192
of 192
73%
sample weight

Performance

2 rated events

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #192 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

1.1

Event performance

1st event percentile

PI

15.3

Prospect index

1st event percentile

ORtg

45.3

Points / 100 poss.

11th event percentile

DRtg

105.7

Lower is better

1st event percentile

NRtg

-60.4

Two-way margin

5th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 45.3 · 11th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 105.7 · Stop% 43.1% · Team DRtg 101.1

Sample context

7 games · 166 minutes · 73% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.6 stocks70th event percentile

Rebounding

3.6 RPG62nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

1.1

1st event percentile

Prospect index

15.3

1st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

45.3

11th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

105.7

1st event percentile

Two-way margin

-60.4

5th event percentile

Stop percentage

43.1%

7th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.3 PPG

38th event percentile

Creation

1.3 APG

53rd event percentile

Rebounding

3.6 RPG

62nd event percentile

Defensive activity

1.6 stocks

70th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

30.0% TS

22nd event percentile

//rated_event_history

Every rated competition

Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 1st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 45.3 ORtg and 105.7 DRtg, producing a -60.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive activity

    1.6 steals + blocks/G

    70th event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    105.7 DRtg

    1st event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  2. Two-way margin

    -60.4 NRtg

    5th event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

  3. Defensive stops

    43.1% Stop%

    7th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

45.3

11th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.3 PPG

38th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

30.0%

22nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

29.7%

28th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

29.7%

36th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.1 attempts per game

Free throws

33.3%

16th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

22.5%

14th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.3 APG

53rd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

105.7

1st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

101.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.6

28th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

43.1%

7th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.6 STL+BLK

70th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-60.4

5th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-44.3

1st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

1.1

1st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

15.3

1st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.1%

11th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.6 RPG

62nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

7

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

166.1

context

23.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

73.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#192

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

589.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

7

GP

3.3

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.3

APG

#192

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#27

RANK

142

FIELD

82%

PERCENTILE

3.7

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#192/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

30%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P38

Playmaking

1.3

P53

Rebounding

3.6

P62

True shooting

30%

P22

Two-way impact

-60.4

P5

Stops

43%

P7

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

11 made / 37 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 1 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

1 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

3% of attempts from three

2PA 363PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

3.3 / game

11–37

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

1–3

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.3 / game

23

TOV

3.3 / game

0.39×

AST:TOV

3

FD

rebounding

25

REB

3.6 / game

13

OREB

12

DREB

3.6

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.0 / game

4

BLK

0.6 / game

8

PF

11

STL+BLK

1.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

1.1

HESI

15.3

PI

45.3

ORtg

105.7

DRtg

-60.4

NRtg

-44.3

Stable NRtg

43%

Stop%

23%

Floor%

30%

eFG%

0%

PIE

101.1

Team DRtg

-4.6

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games166 minutes23.7 min/game73% sample weightrank #192 of 192

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#27/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.7

PPG

3.2

RPG

1.5

APG

2.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.7

P49

Playmaking

1.5

P68

Rebounding

3.2

P48

True shooting

43%

P80

Two-way impact

+19.9

P76

Stops

68%

P58

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

9 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

29%

2 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

2 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

2PA 173PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

22

PTS

3.7 / game

9–24

FGM–FGA

2–7

3PM–3PA

2–4

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.5 / game

16

TOV

2.7 / game

0.56×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.2 / game

11

OREB

8

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.3 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

5

PF

17

STL+BLK

2.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

80.8

HESI

77.4

PI

66.1

ORtg

46.2

DRtg

+19.9

NRtg

+10.4

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

31%

Floor%

42%

eFG%

18%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

-4.5

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games119 minutes19.9 min/game67% sample weightrank #27 of 142
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #191Salimata KoneCôte d'Ivoire

//current_rank

#192

of 192 ranked

//end_of_the_board

No one ranks below this player in the event.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.

  • Micah Ojo portrait#1

    Micah Ojo

    United States

    11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG

    //event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Amelia Alonso portrait#2

    Amelia Alonso

    Spain

    12.4 PPG 7.0 RPG 1.9 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Ivanna Wilson Manyacka portrait#3

    Ivanna Wilson Manyacka

    United States

    12.9 PPG 6.0 RPG 1.7 APG

    //event_signalDisruptor3.4 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTop 3#3 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Meredith Jaime portrait#190

    Meredith Jaime

    MEX

    0.8 PPG 1.2 RPG 0.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

3.7

PPG

3.2

RPG

1.5

APG

2.3

SPG

0.5

BPG

29%

3P%

43%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

7 GP · event rank #192

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

3.6

RPG

1.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

30%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P38

Playmaking

1.3

P53

Rebounding

3.6

P62

True shooting

30%

P22

Two-way impact

-60.4

P5

Stops

43%

P7

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

30%

11 made / 37 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 1 attempts

FT

Free throws

33%

1 made / 3 attempts

Shot selection

3% of attempts from three

2PA 363PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

23

PTS

3.3 / game

11–37

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

1–3

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.3 / game

23

TOV

3.3 / game

0.39×

AST:TOV

3

FD

rebounding

25

REB

3.6 / game

13

OREB

12

DREB

3.6

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.0 / game

4

BLK

0.6 / game

8

PF

11

STL+BLK

1.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

1.1

HESI

15.3

PI

45.3

ORtg

105.7

DRtg

-60.4

NRtg

-44.3

Stable NRtg

43%

Stop%

23%

Floor%

30%

eFG%

0%

PIE

101.1

Team DRtg

-4.6

Def. lift

sample_context

7 games166 minutes23.7 min/game73% sample weightrank #192 of 192

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #27

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.7

PPG

3.2

RPG

1.5

APG

2.7

TOV/G

0.3

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.7

P49

Playmaking

1.5

P68

Rebounding

3.2

P48

True shooting

43%

P80

Two-way impact

+19.9

P76

Stops

68%

P58

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

38%

9 made / 24 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

29%

2 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

2 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

2PA 173PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

22

PTS

3.7 / game

9–24

FGM–FGA

2–7

3PM–3PA

2–4

FTM–FTA

creation

9

AST

1.5 / game

16

TOV

2.7 / game

0.56×

AST:TOV

2

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.2 / game

11

OREB

8

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

14

STL

2.3 / game

3

BLK

0.5 / game

5

PF

17

STL+BLK

2.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

80.8

HESI

77.4

PI

66.1

ORtg

46.2

DRtg

+19.9

NRtg

+10.4

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

31%

Floor%

42%

eFG%

18%

PIE

41.7

Team DRtg

-4.5

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games119 minutes19.9 min/game67% sample weightrank #27 of 142

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.