ORtg
32.6
9th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Mbaiadoum Adrien Djetessem
Point Guard · CHA · b. 2008
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
0.8 stocksDefensive activity · 34th event percentile
0.4 APGCreation · 26th event percentile
- 1.5
- HESI v2.1
- #137
- of 138
- 57%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #137 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
1.5
Event performance
2nd event percentile
PI
12.7
Prospect index
1st event percentile
ORtg
32.6
Points / 100 poss.
9th event percentile
DRtg
90.2
Lower is better
17th event percentile
NRtg
-57.6
Two-way margin
6th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 32.6 · 9th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 90.2 · Stop% 47.8% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
5 games · 81 minutes · 57% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks34th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG26th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
1.5
2nd event percentile
Prospect index
12.7
1st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
32.6
9th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.2
17th event percentile
Two-way margin
-57.6
6th event percentile
Stop percentage
47.8%
15th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
0.8 PPG
13th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
26th event percentile
Rebounding
1.6 RPG
21st event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
34th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
16.8% TS
12th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 2nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 32.6 ORtg and 90.2 DRtg, producing a -57.6 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 6th event percentile
Two-way margin
-57.6 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 9th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
32.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 12th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
16.8% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
0.8 PPG
13th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
16.8%
12th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
9.1%
11th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
9.1%
11th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
100.0%
98th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
14.6%
7th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.4 APG
26th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
90.2
17th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.3
21st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
47.8%
15th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
34th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
15.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-57.6
6th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-35.3
2nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
1.5
2nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
12.7
1st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-1.5%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.6 RPG
21st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
80.8
context16.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
57.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#137
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
492.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
0.8
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.4
APG
#137
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#44
RANK
57
FIELD
23%
PERCENTILE
1.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#137/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.4
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
17%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P13
Playmaking
0.4
P26
Rebounding
1.6
P21
True shooting
17%
P12
Two-way impact
-57.6
P6
Stops
48%
P15
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
9%
1 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
0.8 / game
1–11
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.4 / game
7
TOV
1.4 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
8
REB
1.6 / game
3
OREB
5
DREB
1.6
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
1.5
HESI
12.7
PI
32.6
ORtg
90.2
DRtg
-57.6
NRtg
-35.3
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
15%
Floor%
9%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-5.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#44/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.8
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.8
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
24%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.8
P23
Playmaking
1.8
P75
Rebounding
1.7
P24
True shooting
24%
P20
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
22%
5 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
13%
1 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
11
PTS
1.8 / game
5–23
FGM–FGA
1–8
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.8 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.73×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
10
REB
1.7 / game
4
OREB
6
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
4
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
24%
eFG%
0%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #136Christopher NjerassemPG · Chadrank_below · #138Nguemadem WatsonChad
//current_rank
#137
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#2
Côte d'Ivoire
7.7 PPG 4.0 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalTop 3#2 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#135
#136
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
1.8
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.8
APG
0.5
SPG
0.2
BPG
—
3P%
24%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #137
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.8
PPG
1.6
RPG
0.4
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
17%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.8
P13
Playmaking
0.4
P26
Rebounding
1.6
P21
True shooting
17%
P12
Two-way impact
-57.6
P6
Stops
48%
P15
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
9%
1 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
100%
2 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
0.8 / game
1–11
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
2–2
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.4 / game
7
TOV
1.4 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
8
REB
1.6 / game
3
OREB
5
DREB
1.6
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
1.5
HESI
12.7
PI
32.6
ORtg
90.2
DRtg
-57.6
NRtg
-35.3
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
15%
Floor%
9%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-5.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
6 GP · event rank #44
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.8
PPG
1.7
RPG
1.8
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
24%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.8
P23
Playmaking
1.8
P75
Rebounding
1.7
P24
True shooting
24%
P20
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
22%
5 made / 23 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
13%
1 made / 8 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
35% of attempts from three
●2PA 15●3PA 8
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
11
PTS
1.8 / game
5–23
FGM–FGA
1–8
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.8 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.73×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
10
REB
1.7 / game
4
OREB
6
DREB
1.7
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.5 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
4
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
24%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.